Hi Bob,

I followed your advice and upgraded to OsmAnd+ so I will be able to improve
the OSM and benefit from it when making my routes.

Regards,

Rob

Op ma 18 mei 2020 om 17:54 schreef Bob Gambrel <[email protected]>

> My approach to navigation problems in OSM AND ...
>
> 1) Fix the underlying map as you are already planning to do
> 2) Make sure you have the OSMAND+ with OSMAnd Live subscription.
> 3) Usually within a hour or sometimes more after you update, go to OSMAND
> and and select "OsmAnd Live". You should find your region in the list of
> Live updates.
> 4) Select the region and press UPDATE NOW.
>
> If all goes well the map has been updated and you will be able to use the
> new information.
>
> I have done some informal timings about how long it takes to get the OSM
> changes into OSMAND+ (with Live):
>
> map details: within an hour or so
> navigation routing details: within 5 days
>
> The five days above is only because it took me 5 days to check. It may be
> much sooner, but then again, it might be variable.
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:59 AM Rob Romijn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your quick response.
>> Your suggestion doesn't work. The problem is that the map OsmAnd is using
>> is not correct. A small stretch of road is missing so now the 2 roads are
>> not connected. So only if I use airplane mode (which allow me to draw a
>> straight line) I can move from one road to the other.
>> regards,
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> Op ma 18 mei 2020 om 16:50 schreef 'Xavier' via OsmAnd <
>> [email protected]>:
>>
>>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 07:35:43AM -0700, Rob Romijn wrote:
>>> >My problem is that I like to use the navigation profile to follow the
>>> >corresponding roads. But I experienced that the information in OSM about
>>> >the road is not correct and then the route is not using this road.
>>>
>>> >I could try to update the map (which is a good idea so I already did
>>> share
>>> >the correct information about the road to OSM)
>>>
>>> This is *always* a good idea.  If the underlying OSM map data is
>>> incorrect, then it is best to correct that data, as bad base data input
>>> to OsmAnd will always end up requiring poor workarounds.
>>>
>>> > but is there a way I can bypass the routing and force the system to
>>> >use a certain road, even if it doesn't fit in the navigation profile?
>>>
>>> You'll have to try this for one of the roads that is incorrect.  It
>>> may, or may not, work.
>>>
>>> Setup a route normally, i.e., enter a start and final destination, and
>>> let OsmAnd do it's initial route calculation.
>>>
>>> When it is done, if you are still at the screen with the "Start" button
>>> to begin navigation, you'll notice a circle with a plus (+) icon to the
>>> right of the destination field (you also get the same icon if you
>>> reopen the route screen while navigating an active route).
>>>
>>> That icon, if you touch it, will allow you to add intermediate
>>> destinations to your route.  One of the options is "Select on Map".  If
>>> you add an intermediate destination or two to the road OsmAnd wants to
>>> initially ignore, what results?  Note that adding intermediate
>>> destionations via select on map is most easily done by zooming on the
>>> road to add.  Finger touch positioning is a bit inaccurate, and the
>>> more zoom, the easier it will be to place the intermediate destination
>>> on the desired road itself instead of accidentally next to the road.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "OsmAnd" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/20200518145002.GO28464%40d820.dp100.com
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "OsmAnd" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/CACk6O%3DVATtnUO-2EB5FuShbusSm27r-bVhzZ79nEV9o00%2BntYg%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/CACk6O%3DVATtnUO-2EB5FuShbusSm27r-bVhzZ79nEV9o00%2BntYg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OsmAnd" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/CABVkMXFZZq_%2B3eJM%2Bvq%3DYnPuT-5K9JZ03vX%2B1YcH8ZsjVh%2BPfQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/CABVkMXFZZq_%2B3eJM%2Bvq%3DYnPuT-5K9JZ03vX%2B1YcH8ZsjVh%2BPfQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OsmAnd" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/CACk6O%3DVPLB7eofszaUoLyOByc0VsZiu846BguThOKE6UEUXJ1g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to