On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 02:06:11AM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 01:59:40AM -0700, [email protected] wrote:

>There is also second problem later on this road.
>
>[image: 2.jpg]
>I think that this lane has problem with tags:
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292304503
>becuase the left turn ends and the lane should be over.

There is a tag problem with that segment.

It says this for number of lanes:

lanes=3
lanes:backward=1
lanes:forward=2

So the tags say two forward lanes.

But the turn tagging says:

turn:lanes:forward=through|through|right

So the "forward" turn lanes tag states there should be three forward
lanes.

Note this statement in the "turn:lanes" wiki page:

If you use the ":lanes" suffix, the number of values specified
separated by vertical lines (|) must match the number of lanes
according to their direction.

You mean this segment:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292304503

I see such tagging which is okay:
```
lanes:backward=1
lanes:forward=2
turn:lanes:forward=through|through;right
```
I don't see this tagging: "turn:lanes:forward=through|through|right"

This is because a user named "Mateusz Konieczny" removed that tag on 2021-04-18 06:03:20 (see attached screenshot).

I think that this segment should have such tagging:
```
lanes:backward=1
lanes:forward=1
turn:lanes:forward=through;right
```
I will go with this problem to Polish osm forum and ask them about this
intersection.

That is likely also incorrect, because with a single lane forward, and allowance for through and right turns, you would be mapping a "no left turn" in an odd way. If through and right are allowed, but left is not, it would be properly mapped as a "no left turn" not a turn lanes. Which is likely why user "Mateusz Konieczny" removed the tag entirely.

In any case, yes, discuss with local mappers before making any change.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OsmAnd" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/20210418135606.GA1085%40d820.dp100.com.

Reply via email to