@pegobufi: I think you did the right thing.
tourism=attraction is deprecated anyway. Better would be to use
tourism_attraction=yes.
a tourism attraction is the Eiffel tower, or a castle or famous museum or a
specific statue or perhaps even a great looking waterfall or "the oldest
tree in the country", but to mark an entire region is not correct from my
point of view.
This tag is under discussion anyway. Why is one "thing" more an
attraction than another.
If you use overpass-turbo.eu with the query
(
node[tourism=attraction]({{bbox}});
way[tourism=attraction]({{bbox}});
relation[tourism=attraction]({{bbox}});
);
out;
Of course you can use it only with node, way or relation. But I only find
nodes in general (like the Eiffel tower, Brandenburger tor, etcetera)
like
node[tourism=attraction]({{bbox}});
out;
And when you use that in an area with a lot of those tourist attractions
(big older cities are mostly crowded with these things), you find multiple
orange (actually light brown) areas.
If I use the overpass query in Den Haag (The Hague), then Madurodam is
crowded with those tourism=attraction tags, giving quite some orange areas.
So yes: the orange area is a "tourism=attaction" rendering.
And if you look inside the default render xml, you see that as well:
https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-resources/blob/master/rendering_styles/default.render.xml#L2927-L2940
(slow link, be patient)
It's more a semi-transparent light-brown by the way.
Unfortunately it is not described in the Map Legend:
https://osmand.net/docs/user/map-legend/osmand
Harry
Op ma 17 okt. 2022 om 17:14 schreef Peter B - pebogufi <[email protected]>:
> I just removed tourism=attraction, I think it is obsolete for a
> multiploygon.
> So wait for an update of map.
>
> [email protected] schrieb am Montag, 17. Oktober 2022 um 16:57:24
> UTC+2:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 15:43, Max1234Ita <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I just checked the same in my smartphone: in effect, disablig the
>>> "More details" option does remove the orange overlay from the map.
>>>
>>> However, this is not "the" solution: as said by @pebogufi, it might be a
>>> map issue.
>>> The best action would be to investigate the area with a map editor
>>> and/or ask a member of the local (French) OSM Community to check and fix
>>> it, if possible.
>>>
>>
>> I *think* this is caused by
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14262576/history which is
>> apparently a micronation https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saugeais tagged
>> as a tourism=attraction. I'm not sure what an appropriate top-level tag
>> would be, but probably some kind of boundary.
>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OsmAnd" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/1c107483-2551-4a57-b9e5-6b30cbe4885en%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/1c107483-2551-4a57-b9e5-6b30cbe4885en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OsmAnd" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/CAGARPpuCpnaJYenkb7D_1MZpGsm0Hg36_nZ-StTFfMH0udwaHg%40mail.gmail.com.
