If you can download live update, the area is no more yellow, else you have to wait for update next month.
[email protected] schrieb am Montag, 17. Oktober 2022 um 19:12:38 UTC+2: > @pegobufi: I think you did the right thing. > tourism=attraction is deprecated anyway. Better would be to use > tourism_attraction=yes. > a tourism attraction is the Eiffel tower, or a castle or famous museum or > a specific statue or perhaps even a great looking waterfall or "the oldest > tree in the country", but to mark an entire region is not correct from my > point of view. > This tag is under discussion anyway. Why is one "thing" more an > attraction than another. > > > If you use overpass-turbo.eu with the query > ( > node[tourism=attraction]({{bbox}}); > way[tourism=attraction]({{bbox}}); > relation[tourism=attraction]({{bbox}}); > ); > out; > > Of course you can use it only with node, way or relation. But I only find > nodes in general (like the Eiffel tower, Brandenburger tor, etcetera) > like > node[tourism=attraction]({{bbox}}); > out; > > And when you use that in an area with a lot of those tourist attractions > (big older cities are mostly crowded with these things), you find multiple > orange (actually light brown) areas. > If I use the overpass query in Den Haag (The Hague), then Madurodam is > crowded with those tourism=attraction tags, giving quite some orange areas. > > So yes: the orange area is a "tourism=attaction" rendering. > > And if you look inside the default render xml, you see that as well: > https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-resources/blob/master/rendering_styles/default.render.xml#L2927-L2940 > > (slow link, be patient) > It's more a semi-transparent light-brown by the way. > > Unfortunately it is not described in the Map Legend: > https://osmand.net/docs/user/map-legend/osmand > > Harry > > Op ma 17 okt. 2022 om 17:14 schreef Peter B - pebogufi <[email protected] > >: > >> I just removed tourism=attraction, I think it is obsolete for a >> multiploygon. >> So wait for an update of map. >> >> [email protected] schrieb am Montag, 17. Oktober 2022 um 16:57:24 >> UTC+2: >> >>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 15:43, Max1234Ita <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, I just checked the same in my smartphone: in effect, disablig the >>>> "More details" option does remove the orange overlay from the map. >>>> >>>> However, this is not "the" solution: as said by @pebogufi, it might be >>>> a map issue. >>>> The best action would be to investigate the area with a map editor >>>> and/or ask a member of the local (French) OSM Community to check and fix >>>> it, if possible. >>>> >>> >>> I *think* this is caused by >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14262576/history which is >>> apparently a micronation https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saugeais tagged >>> as a tourism=attraction. I'm not sure what an appropriate top-level tag >>> would be, but probably some kind of boundary. >>> >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "OsmAnd" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/1c107483-2551-4a57-b9e5-6b30cbe4885en%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/1c107483-2551-4a57-b9e5-6b30cbe4885en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/e37c41a9-46e0-4916-ae07-37db9fa18aefn%40googlegroups.com.
