I think it should become a WG draft. ------ Original Message ------ Received: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:41:05 PM PST From: Acee Lindem <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>Cc: Vishwas Manral <[email protected]> Subject: [OSPF] Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3
> Speaking as WG Co-Chair: > > At the last OSPF WG meeting, there was some interest in this draft. I'm now asking for opinions for and against. > > Speaking as a WG member: > > The authors (myself included) would not like to make this a WG draft. On the OSPF list and at the OSPF WG meeting, the only dissent was on along the lines of making IPsec (including IKEv2) work better with OSPFv3 rather than doing this. I don't disagree that this should be a goal but I don't think it should preclude this work. > > Thanks, > Acee > --------------------------------------------- > Attachment: smime.p7s > MIME Type: application/pkcs7-signature > --------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
