> > Thanks for the info, however, our OS isn't quite ready to be > announced
Hmm does it have anything to do with netscape.net ? ;) > yet, so I can't really talk about it at this point. When the time > comes, > you'll know who we are. There are many other things that we'll have > to maintain, since we're a very small team. With that being the > case, > it would make more sense to port over OSS, than to port/write sound > drivers one by one. I see, indeed that's what motivated the OSS port to BeOS. We now have an almost working hda driver, but still some other cards needs it. And I definitely won't have a native driver for my ATI IXP chipset anyway. Now, depending on your OS architecture it will be quite simple or more complex. Having POSIX semantics (device files, ioctl...) will help quite a lot. François. _______________________________________________ oss-devel mailing list oss-devel@mailman.opensound.com http://mailman.opensound.com/mailman/listinfo/oss-devel
