On 2008-Sep-01, at 09:57, Mark Smith wrote: >> Is there one fact in particular that really nails her as >> irresponsible/trying to terminate? > > I think you may have forgotten the original premise: she wasn't > pregnant ! > > Her unusually laid-back approach to a minor emergency in a late-stage, > late-life pregnancy is merely one of the many facets suggesting that > she may not have been pregnant.
Ah yes, Lewis' option 2. I'm open to her being capable of trying a stunt like that. People skilled in lying may construct a lie by calculating what can they say that is just plausible enough for them to get away with it. ArcXIX made a very suggestive case, it's just filled with many assumptions. She might not have been laid-back--she may just have been busy, motivated, driven, determined, and unwilling to sacrifice a speech at a time when her profile was being raised, unwilling to sacrifice work unless unless it was a real emergency. Should she have stopped work altogether in the last month given she was high risk? Or if she carries on working, at what point does she stop? Maybe we can just accuse her of being a professional cold-hearted bitch. I'd go with that. Stefano _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
