On Sep 7, 2008, at 6:04 PM, LuKreme wrote: > On 6-Sep-2008, at 03:52, Jared Earle wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Chris Gehlker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/04/jon-stewart-hits-karl-rov_n_123852.html >> >> Brilliant. >> >> Teen pregnancy, until Sarah Palin's Daughter Bristols got pregnant, >> was the parents' fault, according to many right-wing pundits. I >> applaud Bristols for finally making them change their opinion. > > You're not that naive. > > Teen pregnancy and premarital sex is only ok if you are a fundie > christer. >
It's ok. The left just needs to keep hammering on her family and we will see if we can turn an 11 point bounce into a 15 pointer. It's been pretty amusing that Obama has been reduced to arguing that he is *more* qualified than the Veep selection of the other side. That's arguing that you should be rated #1 because you are better than they other teams #2. That is simply a loosing argument. I noticed over the weekend that his people started saying that "we are not running against Palin" trying to back pedal on some of their surrogates attacks. That may be, but she *is* running against Obama and he has yet to find an effective counter that doesn't further piss off the women that support her. In the same way Hilliary had to be careful of her attacks lest she be called racist, Obama has a problem figuring out how to attack Palin without being seen as sexist. The PC stuff has finally come full circle to bite the Libs on the ass, hard. Obama's team has been great on offense but they doesn't seem to do defense well, and they are obviously on defense when it come to her. When is the last time you heard Obama "on message"? The answer is, not since Palin was picked. =c= _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
