Great article
<http://www.newsweek.com/id/169160>

"In recent months, conservative economists and editorialists have  
tried to pin the blame for the unholy international financial mess on  
subprime lending and subprime borrowers. If bureaucrats and social  
activists hadn't pressured firms to lend to the working poor, the  
narrative goes, we'd still be partying like it was 2005 and Bear  
Stearns would be a going concern. The Wall Street Journal's editorial  
page has repeatedly heaped blame on the Community Reinvestment Act  
(CRA), the 1977 law aimed at preventing redlining in minority  
neighborhoods. Fox Business Network anchor Neil Cavuto in September  
proclaimed that "loaning to minorities and risky folks is a disaster."

"This line of reasoning is absurd on several levels. Many of the  
biggest subprime lenders weren't banks, and thus weren't covered by  
the CRA. Nobody forced Bear Stearns to borrow $33 for every dollar of  
assets it had, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac didn't coerce highly  
compensated CEOs into rolling out no-money-down, exploding adjustable- 
rate mortgages. Banks will lose just as much money lending to really  
rich white guys like former Lehman Brothers CEO Richard Fuld as they  
will on loans to poor people of color in the South Bronx."

--
A young idea is a beautiful and a fragile thing. Attack people, not  
ideas.

_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/

Reply via email to