On 03 Feb 2009, at 18:27, Charles Bennett wrote: > The damnable thing is that nanny and anti-nanny reactionary isn't > limited by party, but by issue and both sides have their nanny > components. > > That's why I usually think that the less they can intrude (either > side) the happier I'll be.
We're in complete agreement. I specifically couched it as (anti-) nanny rather than conservative/liberal/right/left/Rep/Dem. I fall under the older Republican party of limited but effective government and minimal intrusion into my life with socialist sympathies (I agree with their points about the failures of capitalism but disagree with their proposed solutions) and I have absolutely nothing in common with social conservatives now running the party so I like to quote Reagan: I didn't leave the Republicans; they left me. I generally self-identify as a republican rather than Republican. Dave -- "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." -- C. A. R. "Tony" Hoare _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
