|
Ron:
Hopefully, the doctor's verdict is not final- it is not that
unusual for it to change. What is the extent/ nature of your injury?
I agree with Maria. The practitioner should be confident/
knowledgable in his area of practice. I don't believe in segregation of
body parts or roles for physical and occupational therapy. Following-up from my
last mailing, I would find it hard to comprehend an occupational therapist who
says he is working on function, and not working directly or indirectly with its
performanace components such as ROM/ ms. strength/ endurance (good buzz:
activity tolerance), i.e, using the biomechanical FOR in orthopedic cases such
as this. Hopefully not, otherwise any functional approach without keeping the
biomechanical/ kinesiological aspects in mind, could be detrimental. Or,
find me a PT that is applying the biomechanical FOR but is in no way
facilitating the "functional independence" of his patient. However, I am an OT
myself, and believe in the global impact and range of services we offer.
Especially, when you expect residual deficits, I believe the OT takes on a more
crusading role as the adaptor/facilitator, teaching or ensuring optimal
adaptations/compensation to minimize the disability to the best it can be. Can a
PT do it, too? I am sure we all know of some PTs that could do it better than
some OTs, and some OTs that can do a better job in gait analysis and training
than some PTs. For those OTs AND PTs that are ready to mark their boundaries,
isn't ambulation a part of basic ADLs? Both APTA's and AOTA's
practice guidelines claim and cover this as their domain.
Am I proposing a merger of titles of
physical/occupational therapist? No as there are certainly other aspects to
this, we are not prepared or trained for this yet, at least not yet. What would
insurance companies think of this? What impact will it have on medicare
dollars? What will our associations do even at the thought (it sure as
occured to others)- laugh? Ron you are an enlightened health professional. What
do you think the doctor, or the general public would do in your case- who should
they choose? With out really knowing the difference or with out there being a
real difference of professional expertise (just the difference of individual
practitioner's expertise)?
Joe
----- Original Message -----
|
- Treatment for a Fractured Elbow Ron Carson
- Re: Treatment for a Fractured Elbow Joe Wells
- Re: Treatment for a Fractured Elbow Incandescent
- Re: Fwd: Treatment for a Fractured Elbow Ron Carson
- Re: Fwd: Treatment for a Fractured Elbow Maria Aguilera
- Re[2]: Fwd: Treatment for a Fractured Elb... Joe Wells
- Re[2]: Fwd: Treatment for a Fracture... Ron Carson
- Re: Re[2]: Fwd: Treatment for a ... Joe Wells
- Re[4]: Fwd: Treatment for a ... Ron Carson
- Re: Re[4]: Fwd: Treatment fo... Joe Wells
- Re[6]: Fwd: Treatment for a ... Ron Carson
- RE: Re[6]: Fwd: Treatment fo... Joan Riches
- RE: Treatment for a Fractured Elbow Jane Harmon
- Re: Treatment for a Fractured Elbow Melanie Arnold
- RE: Treatment for a Fractured Elbow Phillips, Irene
- Re: Treatment for a Fractured Elbow CndyGirl50
