>From my previous post:

"However, the very word "occupational" added to therapy, should enable us
and
the public to view it as interventions to facilitate any and all activities/
functions done to "occupate" one-self  *appropriately* in selfcare, work,
play
or leisure....."

Hi Ron:

I agree not everything is occupation (some could be 'incubation' or
'dissipation!), hence, I was careful to use the word "appropriately" before
the occupational tasks as selfcare, work, play or leisure...

Considering your example of PT students being trained more on pelvis and
below versus OTs on upper extremities (with the cervical and trunk being the
common ground/ common discard); if I remember my myology correctly, out of
the 620+ muscles in our body, the upper accounted more than the lower
extremities.....again, would that mean OTs have more knowledge on the
physical dysfunctions. Just kidding :-)

My true belief is that PTs and OTs are equally trained or should be on
physical dysfunctions which doesn't only involve the biomechanical aspects
involving strength and ROM, but also sensori-motor functions, edema/ skin
integrity, coordination/ balance, reflexes, etc- etc. (all physical/
physiological aspects of functioning). Though equally trained, you would see
certain OTs better in these areas when it comes to practice and vice-versa.
The clinicians develop skills individually during and after training. In my
disability evaluations for the State, I perform tests to identify spinal
impingements such as SLR, Laseuge's, Bowstring's etc., also I do muscle/ ROM
for the whole body. I strongly believe that is required to understand the
underlying functional deficits, whether some body is faking 'disability',
and what is the impact of the functional loss.

I was personally taught all my basic sciences- anatomy, physiology,
biomechanics/ kinesiology, medicine, surgery, pathology, microbiology,
biochemistry, psychiatry/ abnormal psychology, orthopedics, neurology, PMR,
communication disorders, OB/ GYN, etc. etc. sitting alongside the PTs
throughout my curriculum, and all my teachers were medical doctors for the
medical subjects, all with post graduate degrees. All my coursework/
examinations were absolutely the same as the PTs in my class. My OT classes
involved muscle testing/ arthrometric testing of the lower extremity/ trunks
as well, as PTs had the uppers. I was a little taken aback by the division
of the body in the U.S., the at times overzealous use of PAMs by both PTs
and OTs, the OTs that became ADL or kitchen queens or, super handymen, and,
the PTs ability to do it all including recommending AEs, after I migrated
here.

I really would like to know what kind of "true" physical dysfunctions, would
not cause an occupational limitation. By true, I do not mean mere loss of a
few degrees of ROM, or a subjective 4 minus versus 4/5 muscle strength
(because that is still WFL- Within Functional Limits, and the patient still
is able to carry out his functions as needed. As clinicians, especially as
OTs, we all know that 'normal' is a relative term.

As OTs, PTs or what not, we probably have different techniques that we are
more comfortable or better at- e.g., contrast bath,  versus ultrasound for
the hand... My personal knowledge to address a LBP would be to teach the
patient proper body mechanics,/ avoid stressful positions, modify his/ her
environment, ensure safe selfcare/ work/ play techniques;  while a PT might
perform interferential treatments or soft-tissue manipulations (the great
word for "massage") and a DC provide spinal manipulations (per practice
acts, the only ones in the US allowed to do it, besides the DOs and MDs).
What individual approach works and provides/ facilitates 'meaning' is
certainly dependent upon the individual ( hey, a new saying , "...the bearer
knows where the back glitches" !). Or may be, all the treatment approaches
is required at the same time.

Academicians- are there any outcome studies based upon disciplines
intervening or even on individual treatment approaches used by different
professions, including placebo studies- how do you do a placebo spinal
manipulation, or a placebo intereferential? How do you 'place- a- boo' with
body-mechanics education? I hope you are getting my drift.

My view: if there is a true 'dysfunction', it will transcribed into an
occupational deprivement or limitation, OT would be indicated. What OT
approach/ modality is used should be based upon the 'clinical judgement' of
the clinician concerned. Obviously, although I know OTs performing driver
rehab, I am not trained/ comfortable in it. Hence, ethically if I do get a
referral it would go to another OT. Similarly, although I know that OTs may
do incontinence therapy, since I have no interest/ skills in it, I will
refer it to my PT who is specially trained in it.

To make an already long story, longer- although, I feel OT would be
indicated in almost all physical dysfunction cases; I do not always think
everybody is capable to handle everything (based upon individual comfort and
knowledge).....that is why, we have specialists within our own discipline
and outside of ours and, clients most often need the services of more than
one discipline simultaneously. Hence, "we treat the whole person, just don't
do the whole treatment"....

Just my thoughts!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Carson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joe Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [OTlist] what is OT?


> Hello Joe:
>
> I  imagine that the number of PT's billing under self-care and community
> re-entry is very small. But maybe you are correct.
>
> Everything  done  to occupy ourselves is not occupation. Much of what we
> do during our days/nights is not significant or personally meaningful.
>
> I  whole-heartedly  disagree  that  OT's  are  equally trained to handle
> physical  dysfunction.  I  how  for  a  fact,  that  PT  students at the
> University  that  I  previously  taught  at  received much more advanced
> training  in physical dysfunction. I may be wrong, but I bet that the OT
> and PT students on this list will confirm my statement. Also, OT's at my
> previous  place  of  employment  are  primarily  trained  in  the  upper
> extremity,  not  the  pelvis,  spine  or  lower  extremity.  So,  in  my
> experience,  OT's are less trained in physical dysfunction than PT's and
> especially  in  LE's. Which lends further stamina to my disagreeing with
> Estelle B. about OT's treating the whole body.
>
> Ron
>
> As for mock cases I can pretty much tell you how I will treat.
>
> 1.  Use  the  OPPM  (occupational  perfomance  process  model)  to guide
> intervention, outcomes and treatment
>
> 2. Use the COPM as my outcome measure.
>
> 3.  Accordingly,  if  the  client doesn't have occupational issues, send
> them to someone else.
>
> Ron
>
> =============================================
>
> On 8/7/2003,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> JW> I believe that the use of the word 'function' in the realms of PT is
> JW> strictly related to physical/ physiological functioning. PTs use CPT
> JW> codes  97535,  97537  for  their clients as well, as they do address
> JW> self care needs or community/ work integration needs with activities
> JW> such as, donning/ doffing a BK prosthesis, or wheelchair mobility at
> JW> work/ mall, etc..
>
> JW> However,  the  very  word  "occupational"  added  to therapy, should
> JW> enable  us  and the public to view it as interventions to facilitate
> JW> any  and  all  activities/  functions  done  to  "occupate" one-self
> JW> appropriately  in  selfcare, work, play or leisure.....this includes
> JW> not  only physical functioning, but mental and emotional functioning
> JW> as well, to live life wholly. I do not believe that OTs are any less
> JW> trained   to   handle  the  physical  dysfunctions  than  any  other
> JW> professionals.  OTs  are  equipped  with  the  skills and, must look
> JW> further  than  the  physical  aspects  of  dysfunctions that lead to
> JW> occupational  limitations/  deprivation.  By  sheer census, most OTs
> JW> today   work   with   physical  dysfunctions  versus  psychiatry  or
> JW> developmental  disorders. To address the "occupational dysfunctions"
> JW> due to physical causes, one has to address those as well.
>
> JW> I  am  with  Jimmie and Lori and agree that modalities/ tools of any
> JW> kind-  exercise,  PAMS,  splinting,  AE  should  be  encompassed  to
> JW> facilitate   the   client   to   function   in  an  "occcupationally
> JW> independent"  and  safe  environment.  Modalities/  tools  are  just
> JW> that...they cannot be the sole treatment by themselves.
>
> JW> Ron  et al: maybe we can discuss mock cases and then put forward our
> JW> arguments  as  why or why not OT is needed and how to diffferentiate
> JW> between an OT and an UE PT? ( How come LE OTs do not exist?)
>
> JW> -----    Original    Message    -----    From:   "Jimmie   Arcenaux"
> JW> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    To:    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    Sent:
> JW> Thursday, August 07, 2003 1:56 PM Subject: RE: [OTlist] what is OT?
>
> >> Lori,  I too use modalities infrequently (approximately less than 10%
> >> of  my  patients), but feel the use of modalities can be incorporated
> >> into  OT  practice.  In  fact, at my work site I am in the process of
> >> training  our PT staff to properly utilize therapeutic modalities. We
> >> have had a
> JW> reoccurring
> >> problem with patient's requesting early d/c from therapy secondary to
pain
> >> complaints.  Under further review I noted that the PTs and OTs were not
> >> addressing the pain prior to attempting tasks which would undoubtedly
> >> increase the severity of pain complaints.  I am addressing this with
pain
> >> management instruction which includes the use of modalities, relaxation
> >> training, energy conservation, work simplification, joint protection,
> >> posture, and body mechanics.
> >> Jimmie
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:21 AM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: [OTlist] what is OT?
>
> >> Dear  Jimmie-  I told you this was an issue in the past. Now, you see
> >> what I mean. I
> JW> say
> >> we are trained in school and licensed in our states to do it, then it
is
> JW> OT.
> >> AOTA approves, NBCOT approves, states approve(of course some require
> >> additional training).  So, it is OT!!!!
> >> Lori
>
> >> In  a  message  dated  8/7/2003  8:07:29  AM  Eastern  Daylight Time,
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >> > I really struggle with OT's using thermoelectric modalities.
>
> >> >  Please  understand that I have used e-stim, tens, hot/cold, etc as
> >> part  >  of  my  treatment  plans.  And as you say, all of these were
> >> intended  to  > improve function. Of course, the PT's doing similar >
> >> treatments also > said that they were trying to improve function.
>
> >> *****************************��**********************************
>
> >> To remove yourself from the OTnow mail list, send a message to:
>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> In the message's *body*, put the following text:
>
> >> unsubscribe OTlist
>
> >> -
>
> >> List messages are archived at:
>
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> *****************************��***********************************
>
> >> *****************************��**********************************
>
> >> To remove yourself from the OTnow mail list, send a message to:
>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> In the message's *body*, put the following text:
>
> >> unsubscribe OTlist
>
> >> -
>
> >> List messages are archived at:
>
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> *****************************��***********************************
>
> JW> *****************************��**********************************
>
> JW> To remove yourself from the OTnow mail list, send a message to:
>
> JW> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> JW> In the message's *body*, put the following text:
>
> JW> unsubscribe OTlist
>
> JW> -
>
> JW> List messages are archived at:
>
> JW> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> JW> *****************************��***********************************
>
>
> *****************************��**********************************
>
> To remove yourself from the OTnow mail list, send a message to:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In the message's *body*, put the following text:
>
> unsubscribe OTlist
>
> -
>
> List messages are archived at:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> *****************************��***********************************
>


*****************************��**********************************

To remove yourself from the OTnow mail list, send a message to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

In the message's *body*, put the following text:

unsubscribe OTlist

-

List messages are archived at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*****************************��***********************************

Reply via email to