Hi Carmen and Ron:

Maybe I missed something, but can you give me a website and/or phone number for 
S&S please.

Thanks in advance,

Biraj
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ron Carson<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  To: Carmen Aguirre<mailto:[email protected]> 
  Sent: May 16, 2005 3:52 PM
  Subject: Re[4]: [OTlist] Calling all Allen Cogn Screen People!!! A Question


  Hello Carmen:

  To  tell the truth, I started ordering from S&S but when I saw that they
  added  a  "handling" fee in addition to shipping, I opted to not provide
  them my money.

  I  still  don't  understand  why  the  product that I orderd from "Allen
  Conferences"  has a photocopied handbook! But, I will say that IT IS the
  2003 revision!

  Ron

  ===========> Original Message Follows ....

  On5/16/2005, Carmen Aguirre, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
said:

   
  CA> I strongly recommend  anyone interested in ordering ACLS and
  CA> other Allen's battery items, that you go through S&S worldwide. My
  CA> understanding is that Allen Conferences is NO LONGER a
  CA> representative of Claudia Allen's work, revisions to her work,
  CA> education/training on behalf of Claudia Allen, Tina Blue and Kathy
  CA> Earthart. There is a revised version to the 2000 ACLS scoring
  CA> guidelines completed by the Allen Cognitive Advisors network in
  CA> 2003. The guidelines are available ONLY through S&S worldwide.
  CA> Members of the Allen Cognitive Network could answer more
  CA> questions...Contacting Allen conferences and asking about the
  CA> revised version may answer more questions for you...
  CA> Carmen 
  CA>   ----- Original Message ----- 
  CA>   From: Ron Carson<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
  CA>   To: Joan Riches<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
  CA>   Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:40 AM
  CA>   Subject: Re[2]: [OTlist] Calling all Allen Cogn Screen People!!! A 
Question


  CA>   Hello Joan:

  CA>   Thanks  for  pointing out the information about the 4.2 vs. 4.4 scoring.
  CA>   This means that the client scores a 4.4.

  CA>   I  can  not  find the information in my ACLS 2000 manual about the pouch
  CA>   versus  non-pouch.  Can  you  tell  me  what  page in the manual has the
  CA>   explanation?

  CA>   I  must  tell  you  though, I ordered my kit from "Allen Conferences" in
  CA>   Ormond  Beach,  FL.  (literally  20 minutes from my house). When the kit
  CA>   arrived,  it  came  in a open bag that was marked "S&S". The instruction
  CA>   manual  is  a  photocopy of the actual instruction booklet!!! And it was
  CA>   simply  copied onto several pieces of plain paper!! I called the company
  CA>   back  and he insisted that this is the way they receive them from S&S! I
  CA>   wish I had Claudia Allen's e-mail because I would send her this message.

  CA>   Ron

  CA>   ===========> Original Message Follows ....

  CA>   On5/12/2005, Joan Riches,
  CA> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> said:

     
  CA>   JR> Hi Ron
  CA>   JR> My version of the scoring which is the 2000 revision says "When 
there is a
  CA>   JR> discrepancy between the whipstitch and single cordovan stitch, 
score the
  CA>   JR> highest score." This is the last sentence in the administration 
section
  CA>   JR> headed Whipstitch not in the scoring guidelines. 
  CA>   JR> How do your clinical observations of this client fit with the 
profile of the
  CA>   JR> screening score you got? You must validate it somehow by observing 
actual
  CA>   JR> voluntary motor behaviour, or having behaviour described to you by 
someone
  CA>   JR> other than the client, which fits the profile before you report 
conclusions.
  CA>   JR> One way to validate is to continue interventions such as the 
lymphodema
  CA>   JR> wrapping instruction and see if the 4.4 prediction holds. Then you 
have a
  CA>   JR> good case for the client's continuing need for assistance.
  CA>   JR> 4.2/4.4 is such a neat score to start with. It gives you a crack at 
all
  CA>   JR> three stitches but the inability is clear to see. At the beginning 
it is
  CA>   JR> easy to doubt yourself at 4.6 and above when clients can put up a 
verbal
  CA>   JR> screen.
  CA>   JR> My version also explains the pouch versus no pouch as item 6 in the 
set up
  CA>   JR> instructions.
  CA>   JR> Generally to my initial amazement people do do all the things in 
the scoring
  CA>   JR> guidelines. Sometimes they do completely different things. This is 
our cue
  CA>   JR> to look for focal deficits and perceptual problems. It also gives 
you
  CA>   JR> confidence to push for further investigation. Two of our 
'nonstandard'
  CA>   JR> clients had brain tumors and a third had a previously undetected 
abdominal
  CA>   JR> mass - go figure. We kept insisting that there had to be something 
until the
  CA>   JR> docs ordered more investigation.
  CA>   JR> Yes, we use the ADM. Often in a craft group to follow our long term 
care
  CA>   JR> residents who have a base line score so we have a pretty good idea 
where to
  CA>   JR> start, or with people who refuse the leather (often former nurses 
or school
  CA>   JR> teachers). We use it also if we are checking for improvement because
  CA>   JR> learning may be retained from the original administration. If you 
are
  CA>   JR> following a decline you can continue to use the leather. It's an 
expensive
  CA>   JR> proposition for someone working alone in private practice like you. 
What
  CA>   JR> "book" do you have? 
  CA>   JR> Kathy Earhart who has developed most of the ADM was the main 
speaker at last
  CA>   JR> year's symposium and she put us all through our paces. I'll never 
forget my
  CA>   JR> red face when I looked at my own sun hanger and said "There is a 
mistake in
  CA>   JR> the sample." -looked again and saw why the piece in question was 
positioned
  CA>   JR> as it was. We all learned a lot about ourselves.
  CA>   JR> Again - have fun.
  CA>   JR> Joan Riches
     

  CA>   JR> -----Original Message-----
  CA>   JR> From:
  CA> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
  CA>   JR> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
  CA>   JR> Of Ron Carson
  CA>   JR> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 2:38 PM
  CA>   JR> To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
  CA>   JR> Subject: [OTlist] Calling all Allen Cogn Screen People!!! A Question

  CA>   JR> OK  all  you  allen  people,  I  need  help!! The scoring 
guidelines are
  CA>   JR> confusing.

  CA>   JR> The  whipstich  guidelines  indicate  a  score of 4.4 is 
possible,if the
  CA>   JR> client  corrects mistakes. However, the more complicated cordovan 
stitch
  CA>   JR> results  in  a score of 4.2 if the client "follows the whip 
stitch...and
  CA>   JR> does not benefit from [repeated] demonstration".

  CA>   JR> So,  what is the score if the client complete the whipstich and 
corrects
  CA>   JR> mistakes (4.4) but then is unable to do the cordovan stitch (4.2)?

  CA>   JR> Thanks

  CA>   JR> Ron

  CA>   JR> P.S.  I  am  open  and willing to hear any and all suggestions 
about the
  CA>   JR> ACLS.

  CA>   JR> p.s.s. Does anyone use the Allen Diag. Module (ADM)?




  CA>   -- 
  CA>   Unsubscribe?
  CA>    
  CA> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>

  CA>   Change options?
  CA>    
  CA> 
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com<http://www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com<http://www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com<http://www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com>>

  CA>   Archive?
  CA>    
  CA> 
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>>

  CA>   Help?
  CA>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
  CA> --
  CA> Unsubscribe?
  CA>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  CA> Change options?
  CA>   
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com<http://www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com>

  CA> Archive?
  CA>   
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>

  CA> Help?
  CA>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



  -- 
  Unsubscribe?
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  Change options?
    
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com<http://www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com>
 

  Archive?
    
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>

  Help?
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Unsubscribe?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Change options?
  www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
  www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Help?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to