I STRONGLY believe in the power of Occupational therapy. 

I See the need and the results for enhanced self performance in just about 
every referral even if it is for 1-2 visits. I know and see the factual 
difference with other allied health and have no "sleep-depriving" fears about 
"others' taking over. 
Our profession has a lot to offer to clients and our knowledge in the 5 domains 
is the perfect tool to get started and facilitate restoration, compensation  
and/or adaptations.
As we humans evolve, so our interactions with the environment and our 
occupational landscape . I see us OT's, right there evolving along...

Good day everyone,
Carmen
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: michael butterfield<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 8:06 PM
  Subject: Re: [OTlist] Occupation


  Great posts Carmen and Ron,
               I also have been wondering for a while when an occupation based 
approach is needed. Is it only needed when an exercise/medical model approach 
cant "cure the impairments ?" (ex: complete spinal cord injury or head inury 
with chronic memory loss..) Is an occupation based approach needed when a 
patient is not interested in exercise/medical model approach? (very rare in my 
practice!)?
               Part of my job is covering the swing unit in a critical care 
hospital and I get a lot of hip fx's, TKR, genral deconditioning...in most 
cases once the impairments/compenents are improved pt's are quite happey with 
thier level of independence. When given the choice of brushing thier teeth 
standing at the sink perfoming resistive standing exercises in paraleel bares 
in most cases pt choose the exercises. If i had a dollar for every time a 
patient gave me a goal of "walking by my self" I could pay of my car loan!  
Again in my experience at the orthopedic/geriatric popualtion pt's want thier 
treatment at the impariment compenent level.
               On the flip side another part of my job that I have somewhat 
success with Occupation based approach is with my pediatric/school based kids. 
for ex: third grader with high level CP. failed at home/school learing how to 
tie shoe laces he  was . I helped him spray paint a pair of payless sneakers 
bright gold, one lace got applied glitter glue and worked on reverse chaining 
with "magic shoes"..you peds OT know the rest of the story  after 3 weeks he 
was successful.
                  To make a long rant short, about 75 percent of my job I am 
not using an occupation based approach but my patients still percieve success 
and indepedence in their routine. Am I practicing like a AOTA OT...No...does 
this bother me...sometimes..am I worried about the my future in OT sometimes.
                 Mike Butterfield
                          

  Ron Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
    Yes, we see a dentist because of the toothache, not so we can eat corn
  on the cob! We call the electrician because we have an electrical short,
  not so we can watch TV. We take our care to a mechanic because it's
  broken, not so we can drive to a movie.

  We call an OT because because we can't wash our feet....

  Now, who thinks of OT like that?? NO ONE, well almost no one!

  About the only time that I hear mention of OT (keep in mind that I work
  in an outpatient private practice setting) is for fine motor, UE, and
  cognition. Once, I had a referral from a chiropractor to do a home
  safety assessment for his Dad, also a chiropractor. But by far, OT is
  normally referred to for anything OTHER than occupation. And that's a
  problem!

  In my opinion, we MUST:

  1. Change our message

  2. Change our delivery

  3. Or a combination of the two

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Carmen Aguirre 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006
  To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
  Subj: [OTlist] Occupation

  CA> Ron...
  CA> When we get sick, have a tooth ache, bleeding, etc we seek a
  CA> doctor to stop/cure/remediate the cause in order to restore "normal"
  CA> life (occupation). Why would it be different for patients who need
  CA> our services...I truly don't see the dis-articulation. Help?
  CA> Carmen
  CA> ----- Original Message ----- 
  CA> From: Ron Carson 
  CA> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  CA> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 11:17 AM
  CA> Subject: Re: [OTlist] Occupation


  CA> Yes, I agree 100% with your statement. BUT most patients that I see are
  CA> not at the point of compensation. And besides, I don't think that
  CA> compensation is really a big part of medicine. I just can't see me going
  CA> to a doctor and saying;

  CA> " If you have any patients who can't use their arms, hands, legs,
  CA> etc. then send them to me so I can teach them how to compensate"

  CA> Maybe this SHOULD be the role of OT but it is one role that in my
  CA> opinion is not highly promoted, practiced or warranted for many of our
  CA> patients.

  CA> Ron

  CA> ----- Original Message -----
  CA> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  CA> >
  CA> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006
  CA> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
  CA> >
  CA> Subj: [OTlist] Occupation

  CA> Enrc> Ok - I understand what you're saying, but let's just say that it was
  CA> Enrc> not possible that this person receive a lens replacement and 
everything
  CA> Enrc> did not get better and the problem could not be fixed. In this case,
  CA> Enrc> occupation and compensation WOULD come to the forefront, no?

  CA> Enrc> ----- Original Message -----
  CA> Enrc> From: Ron Carson
  CA> >
  CA> Enrc> Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 7:34 am
  CA> Enrc> Subject: [OTlist] Occupation
  CA> Enrc> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

  CA> >> Hello All:
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> Recently Biraj pointed out that I:
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> > always championed and advocated, very strongly I might
  CA> >> add,> occupation-based practice but now it seems [I am]
  CA> >> extremely> disappointed of anything the term has to do with in the
  CA> >> OT profession.
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> Biraj is correct about my past vocalizations but today I don't 
  CA> >> feel that
  CA> >> I am disappointed about occupation. I still feel the same
  CA> >> aboutoccupation but I think that I am becoming a bit jaded
  CA> >> at trying to
  CA> >> integrate occupation into my private practice. You see, 
  CA> >> occupation is
  CA> >> important, it's important to ALL of us, but what I am 
  CA> >> discovering is
  CA> >> that treating occupational deficits does not fit well with my
  CA> >> clientsbecause clients don't consider occupational deficits to be
  CA> >> the problem.
  CA> >> Here's a non-OT story to make my point.
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> Recently, someone I know was diagnosed with cataracts. The 
  CA> >> cataractsaffected his vision to the point that modifications were
  CA> >> needed to read,
  CA> >> work and play. Now, what do you think this person saw as the
  CA> >> problem;cataracts or occupations. Obviously, the impact on his
  CA> >> occupation is
  CA> >> what brought the cataracts to the forefront and motivated him to
  CA> >> seek a
  CA> >> lens replacement, but cataracts are the problem, not the
  CA> >> loss of
  CA> >> occupation. So, the person received a lens replacement and 
  CA> >> everything is
  CA> >> getting better. Well, how does this 'story' apply to OT.
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> Simple, our clients are seeking answers to problems. They want
  CA> >> theseproblems fixed. But the problems are not occupation, the
  CA> >> problems are
  CA> >> things like weakness, loss of balance, developmental delay, 
  CA> >> depression,etc. Clients see these 'components' as the problem and
  CA> >> this is what they
  CA> >> expect their therapist to address. This is the way the entire
  CA> >> world of
  CA> >> medicine works and for OT to be any different just doesn't work.
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> What I think needs to be done is for our patients to recognize
  CA> >> loss of
  CA> >> occupation as the primary problem. Then, they recognize the need
  CA> >> for an
  CA> >> occupational therapist. And as far as I can tell, the ONLY way 
  CA> >> that this
  CA> >> is going to happen on a large scale is for AOTA to put 
  CA> >> together a
  CA> >> NATIONAL ad campaign directed at educating people about 
  CA> >> occupation and
  CA> >> thus occupational therapy.
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> Finally, there are settings were occupation is the concern but 
  CA> >> about the
  CA> >> only one that I know of is long-term mental health. And 
  CA> >> given that
  CA> >> therapeutic occupation is rooted in mental health, this makes
  CA> >> perfectsense. But for the majority of OT's working in the US,
  CA> >> I think that
  CA> >> trying to integrate occupation as our main form and outcome is
  CA> >> a lost
  CA> >> battle, unless patients are EDUCATED, INTEGRATE and 
  CA> >> EXPERIENCEoccupation-based therapy.
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> Ron
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> -- 
  CA> >> Unsubscribe?
  CA> >> 
  CA> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> Change options?
  CA> >> 
  CA> 
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com<http://www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com>
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> Archive?
  CA> >> 
  CA> 
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
  CA> >> 
  CA> >> Help?
  CA> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  CA> >> 



  CA> -- 
  CA> Unsubscribe?
  CA> 
  CA> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  CA> Change options?
  CA> 
  CA> 
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com<http://www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com>

  CA> Archive?
  CA> 
  CA> 
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>

  CA> Help?
  CA> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


  -- 
  Unsubscribe?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  Change options?
  
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com<http://www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com>
 

  Archive?
  
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>

  Help?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





  ---------------------------------
  Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ 
countries) for 2ยข/min or less.
  -- 
  Unsubscribe?
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  Change options?
    
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com<http://www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com>
 

  Archive?
    
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>

  Help?
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- 
Unsubscribe?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Change options?
  www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

Archive?
  www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Help?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to