I think what we are really talking about is ethical dilemmas.

By  definition  an ethical dilemmas occurs when there is more than one
correct  choice and the dilemma is choosing the most correct. Dilemmas
often  occur  in  the  face  of  competing entities, in this case; the
patient, payeer, employer and employee.

As  health  care  providers, we SHOULD be compelled to do what is best
for  the  patient.  But,  there  are competing forces which makes this
choice  very  difficult  at times. In fact, doing what's right for the
patient can cost a therapist their job.

Ron
--
Ron Carson MHS, OT

----- Original Message -----
From: Brent Cheyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] doubling patient in acute rehab

BC> To Ron, Chris and the List,
BC> For the sake of continuing the doubling/dovetailing conversation,
BC> I'd like to  talk about ethics...the  labels of "ethical and
BC> unethical" situations get  freely tossed around a lot in talk
BC> about the OT world. To say that something is "unethical" because
BC> it is against the rules means if you follow the rules your are  
supposedly"ethical".
BC>  However, truly ethical conduct goes beyond the mere act of
BC> following the 'rules', and is far more complicated. As we have
BC> already observed one clinical setting (acute rehab) may have
BC> different "rules" than another (SNF, Peds etc.).  And often the
BC> rules are hard to find, pin down,  verify,  or subject to multiple
BC> interpretations. Rules change frequently...does that mean our
BC> ethics are also constantly in flux based on corporate,medicare, or 
insurance provider policies?
BC>  
BC> The AOTA has a Code of Ethics (2005) with 7 principles as components:
BC> Principle 1.demonstrate a concern for the safety and well-being
BC> of the recipients of their services. (BENEFICENCE) 
BC> Principle 2. take measures to ensure a recipient’s safety and
BC> avoid imposing or inflicting harm. (NONMALEFICENCE) 
BC> Principle 3 respect recipients to assure their rights. (AUTONOMY, 
CONFIDENTIALITY)
BC> Principle 4. achieve and continually maintain high standards of competence. 
(DUTY).
BC> Principle 5.comply with laws and Association policies guiding the
BC> profession of occupational therapy. (PROCEDURAL JUSTICE) 
BC> Principle 6. provide accurate information when representing the profession. 
(VERACITY)
BC> Principle 7. treat colleagues and other professionals with
BC> respect, fairness, discretion, and integrity. (FIDELITY) 
BC>  
BC>  According to the AOTA these are the ethical principles we follow
BC> to determine if a situation or even a rule is ethical.
BC> Additionally these ethical principles are held in conjuction with
BC> the  OT Core Values (AOTA 1993): Altruism, Equality, Freedom, Justice, 
Truth and Prudence. 
BC>  
BC> So...Based on AOTA  Ethical Principles and Core Values, we take a
BC> look back at doubling/dovetailing patients for treatment and we
BC> know there are certain rules to follow in a variety of contexts of
BC> clinical practice,  Questions Come Up: Should doubling/dovetailing
BC> (DB/DT) always be considered "unethical"  regardless of the
BC> clinical setting ?  If   DBDT is allowed by rule is it still
BC> unethical? If it is generally unethical by what  ethical
BC> principle?   Is DBDT only unethical because it is harder (or
BC> easier) work for the therapist, or can it be proven to be less (or
BC> more) efficient in providing the most effective treatment to the most 
people for the least cost?
BC>  
BC> I think all these questions should have good answers before we go
BC> to our colleagues,  managers, and administrators to talk about the
BC> ethics of practices and policies such as DBDTing.
BC> Any other thoughts or responses?
BC> Brent, an OT


BC> --- On Thu, 11/6/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BC> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

BC> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BC> Subject: OTlist Digest, Vol 44, Issue 7
BC> To: [email protected]
BC> Date: Thursday, November 6, 2008, 3:00 PM

BC> Send OTlist mailing list submissions to
BC>         [email protected]

BC> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
BC>         http://otnow.com/mailman/listinfo/otlist_otnow.com
BC> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
BC>         [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BC> You can reach the person managing the list at
BC>         [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BC> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
BC> than "Re: Contents of OTlist digest..."


BC> Today's Topics:

BC>    1. Re: doubling patient in acute rehab ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


BC> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

BC> Message: 1
BC> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:05:30 -0500
BC> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BC> Subject: Re: [OTlist] doubling patient in acute rehab
BC> To: [email protected]
BC> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BC> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

BC> I think doubling and dovetailing in unethical in acute rehab, since it is a
BC> rule from medicare.? I have not read the rules for SNFs.


BC> -----Original Message-----
BC> From: Brent Cheyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BC> To: Ron Carson <[email protected]>
BC> Sent: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 6:16 pm
BC> Subject: Re: [OTlist] doubling patient in acute rehab



BC> Hello everyone and good topic,
BC> ???? I've worked in SNF rehab geriatrics for the better part of 15 years
BC> and 
BC> doubling/dovetailing has often been part and parcel of business as usual
BC> especially since the PPS RUGs category system was put into place. Coupled 
with
BC> this? RUGs phenomena is a fairly high productivity standard which usually
BC> between 85% to 95% in companies I've known or worked for.?( 8 hour day
BC> means 
BC> 408min?or 6.8 hours?to 456 min or 7.6 hours of therapy contact and 24-72
BC> minutes?to do everything else including meetings, and documentation).
BC> ???? As Jennifer Mc Laughlin OT/L?has said "MCR has changed and allows Med
BC> A to 
BC> be treated concurrently and billed for the minutes engaged in tx as this is 
a
BC> minutes billing vs a modality treatment billing." The MCR B
BC> patients?I've seen 
BC> have always been one-on-one.
BC> ????? There seem to? be a lot of different interpretations of the? Medicare
BC> Rules and Regs and different? Rehab companies and many?therapists/managers 
are
BC> often convinced that they have it all straight.?Curiously, this?doesn't
BC> explain 
BC> the vastly different ranges of accepted practices and?policies?amongst?
BC> different settings and companies. 
BC> ???? As a therapist who has done a fair share of doubling/dovetailing...I am
BC> keenly aware of the advantages and limitations of it's use. And yes--there
BC> are 
BC> times when it is completely inappropriate for conducting skilled 
intervention
BC> related to occupations.However, there are times when it is appropriate to
BC> double 
BC> up patient?when? it is selectively used to conduct treatment efficiently and
BC> free up more time to work one-on-one with a more involved patient in the 
same
BC> caseload. This takes good treatment?planning,time management,?and? clinical
BC> judgement
BC> ??? The real problem is when the dovetailing/doubling becomes an 
everyday-all
BC> day practice in which no 1:1 time is available at any time for anybody. Then
BC> caseloads simply become a? corporate billing mechanism but not skilled 
service.
BC> ?
BC> ??? The question I have is (as I play devil's advocate)....Is doublling
BC> really 
BC> unethical in all circumstances?, or which circumstances? And if it is please
BC> explain what is meant by unethical, in what manner is doubling 
unethical...that

BC> assertion is?one worth specifically articulating.
BC> I'd be interested in hearing from any of you,
BC> Respectfully,
BC> Brent the OT
BC> ?
BC> ?
BC> ?


BC>       
BC> --
BC> Options?
BC> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

BC> Archive?
BC> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]



BC> ------------------------------

BC> --
BC> Unsubscribe?
BC>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BC> Change options?
BC>   www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

BC> Archive?
BC>   www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

BC> Help?
BC>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



BC> End of OTlist Digest, Vol 44, Issue 7
BC> *************************************



BC>       
BC> --
BC> Options?
BC> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

BC> Archive?
BC> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]



--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to