Hello Diane and other:

Diane,  I  strongly  believe  that  when  a  patient has no identifiable
occupational  goals,  then  they should not be seen by OT. After all, if
the  goal of OT is enabling people to engage in occupation and yet there
are  no occupational goals, then what is OT doing? More likely than not,
they are doing exercises, which is wrong on two levels:

1. Does not REQUIRE the skills of a therapist
2. Is not OT

Here's two patients I have today:

1. Patient is unable to care for himself because of weakness and fear of
falling. We will work on standing, transfers and mobility.

2. Patient is unable to care for herself and carry out daily occupations
related  to  her  role  as  a wife. We will work on standing, transfers,
mobility, etc.


None  of my interventions include focused treatment on UE, LE, strength,
etc.  Instead the focus is on restoring lost occupation. This is done by
addressing  SPECIFIC  and  IDENTIFIABLE  problems  which  are preventing
SPECIFIC  and  IDENTIFIED  occupational  goals. It really is a practical
approach  that  I liken to learning to ride a bike. If a person wants to
ride  a bike the best way is to practice, practice, practice. Like wise,
if a person wants to dress, toilet, bathe, shower, cook, clean, laundry,
etc, the best approach is practice, practice, practice.

I want to address some other things, but I'm off to work.

Ron

~~~
Ron Carson MHS, OT
www.OTnow.com


----- Original Message -----
From: Diane Randall <spark...@rcn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com <OTlist@OTnow.com>
Subj: [OTlist] Just About To Give UP............

DR> Hello, As a new OTA/L a week into my first job in a SNF, I have become well
DR> acquainted with the UE focus of OT. But, I think the most frustrating part
DR> of the process is not some much the interventions but the fact that so many
DR> of my patients have really no "occupation" to look forward to when
DR> discharged from rehab. It is no wonder we may be tempted to stick with just
DR> UE exercises. ( besides ADL's we do in rooms)

DR> Question...tell me about a typical day you spend at home?

DR> Replies (paraphrased)

DR> Patient A- "I just watch Soaps..my daughter does everything (cooking,
DR> cleaning)"
DR> Patient B- "I have not worked since I gained weight...have not left the
DR> house except to come here for 2 weeks...thank god for disability."
DR> Patient C- "I don't want therapy and you can't make me go".
DR> patient D- " The nurses do everything for me...why should I dress myself"

DR> How can we motivate patients to value "occupation" when thier goals are to
DR> just get strong enough to go back to their lives which in many cases is
DR> totally dependent on others. Even simple ADL's do not seem to be a goal of
DR> some patients?

DR> I also see in some ways why UE has become so popular in SNF's....it's easy,
DR> it looks productive, and it can be done simultaneously with others.
DR> Productivity expectations have created UE ther-ex focused treatment. It is
DR> almost impossible to individualize OT treatment when you have 5-6 or more
DR> patients seeking your attention all at one time. In addition , I have
DR> noticed PT/OT /Speech seem to be in melting pot of therapy. I see speech do
DR> cognitive activities I learned in school. Sometimes the only difference you
DR> can really tell between an OT and PT in the gym setting is where they focus
DR> patient work (above or below the belt)

DR> HH is a little different..I would expect a HH  agency to value occupation. I
DR> mean...it is one on one therapy for gods sakes. So much can be done in that
DR> setting. I would be frustrated too. We have to make a commitment to see UE
DR> ther-ex as a means to an end. Strength to transfer to a toilet
DR> independently-standing tolerance to create a simple meal in the kitchen from
DR> a recipe chosen by the patient). But is should never be the "only" focus or
DR> we have essentially become PT's..we all need to educate our patients about
DR> what we do...and sadly other professionals around us.

DR> -----Original Message-----
DR> From: otlist-boun...@otnow.com [mailto:otlist-boun...@otnow.com]on
DR> Behalf Of Ron Carson
DR> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 20:28
DR> To: OTlist@OTnow.com
DR> Subject: [OTlist] Just About To Give UP............


DR> I  am  just  about at the end of a very long road of trying to change my
DR> profession.

DR> No  one  seems  to  value  occupation  as  an  outcome.  I refuse to see
DR> patient's with the purpose of improving UE function so my HH agency just
DR> calls  other  OT's  who  will.  PT's  don't appreciate occupation but it
DR> encroaches  on  their  treatment. My agency is clueless about occupation
DR> and has no reason to learn about it.

DR> I so value what I do and I believe that most of my patient's do as well.
DR> Most  of  them can not articulate occupation or occupational therapy but
DR> they do know that I'm there to teach them two things:

DR> 1. How to take care of themselves

DR> 2. How to be productive

DR> I almost cried when I left my agency's staff meeting today. EVERTHING is
DR> about PT, PT, PT, and how wonderful they are. There must be like 15 PT's
DR> while  there  is  only  3 OT's. It's really a sad state of affairs. I am
DR> tired  of going from "hero to zero". Hero with patients and zero with my
DR> agency and other therapists.

DR> The  other  day  a nurse with 24 years experience told a patient that OT
DR> was about small muscles and PT was about gait and large muscle groups. I
DR> promptly  called  the  nurse and explained that OT is about occupation -
DR> i.e.  take  care  of  yourself  and being productive. She said, that she
DR> didn't  know  and that even after all these years she really has no idea
DR> what  OT  does. She suggested that I call my agency and do an inservice.
DR> Now can you even imagine that a home health agency needs an inservice on
DR> the role of OT!! Sad state of affairs.

DR> Am  I the ONLY OT who experiences and feel these emotions???????????????
DR> Gosh,  I hope not. But then on the other hand, maybe it's just me. Maybe
DR> I  just  refuse  to  accept  the  way  things  are.  Maybe  I'm  just  a
DR> self-centered  egotist  who is totally clueless about OT. I truly, truly
DR> don't   understand   WHY  "things"  are  the  way  they  are.  And  more
DR> importantly,  what  can be done, if anything, to change the direction of
DR> UE physical dysfunction OT.


DR> --
DR> Options?
DR> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

DR> Archive?
DR> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com



DR> --
DR> Options?
DR> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

DR> Archive?
DR> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Reply via email to