Quick silly question: should it be packaged as "libotr3", being protocol v3 (which was apparently in line with what was done for 3.x), or "libotr5", being sonumber 5 (which is what distros recommend)?
Thanks On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Ian Goldberg <i...@cypherpunks.ca> wrote: > OK, 4.0.0-rc3 is ready. > > **Please give it a try, and give feedback!** > > (Packagers: don't yet distribute it, but do check that it builds with > your packaging system -- especially the new gcc/ld-hardening > CFLAGS/LDFLAGS. Do note that the libotr so major number is now 5.) > > Barring major showstoppers, the plan is that this is what will go out as > 4.0.0, hopefully at the end of the week. > > Source tarballs: > > http://otr.cypherpunks.ca/libotr-4.0.0-rc3.tar.gz > http://otr.cypherpunks.ca/libotr-4.0.0-rc3.tar.gz.asc > > http://otr.cypherpunks.ca/pidgin-otr-4.0.0-rc3.tar.gz > http://otr.cypherpunks.ca/pidgin-otr-4.0.0-rc3.tar.gz.asc > > Git: > > http://otr.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=otr/libotr;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.0.0-rc3 > http://otr.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=otr/pidgin-otr;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.0.0-rc3 > > [You need to upgrade both libotr and pidgin-otr to 4.0.0-rc3; they're > both incompatible with earlier versions -- even with 4.0.0-rc1.] > > Windows installer: > > http://otr.cypherpunks.ca/binaries/windows/pidgin-otr-4.0.0-0-rc3.exe > http://otr.cypherpunks.ca/binaries/windows/pidgin-otr-4.0.0-0-rc3.exe.asc > > > The Windows binary is built with a little bit of libotr debugging > enabled (-DOTRL_DEBUGGING=1). If you start pidgin from a console, and > type "?OTR!" into a conversation window, it will dump some information > about the current ConnContext (no decryption keys, though). If you type > "?OTR!!", it will dump information about *all* ConnContexts. This > functionality will be removed for the 4.0.0 final release. > > Thanks! > > - Ian _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev