for all we know the generator was proactively tested on a regular basis. testing doesn't preclude failure on a subsequent run.
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 9:23 AM Jim Popovitch via Outages < [email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Chris Vervais <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On May 31, 2015, at 08:06, Jim Popovitch via Outages < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Mark Keymer via Outages > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> But honestly I am guessing it was a failure with no foul play > happening. > >> > >> Apparently no solid proactive testing plan either. > > > > For all we know the generator was checked last week and was fine. > > > > In the absence of all the facts we should probably restrain from > assuming one thing or another and give them the benefit of the doubt. And, > that they're taking this is a learning experience and delving into where > gaps exist and how to close them. > > Of course, for a new DC or relatively new DC operator. But come on, > HE @ FMT2 are where I would expect perfection. > > -Jim P. > _______________________________________________ > Outages mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages >
_______________________________________________ Outages mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
