On 14 November 2016 at 01:59, nickcooper-zhangtonghao <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Guru Shetty > > Because of public ip restrictions , I have different private IPs sharing a > single outbound internet IP. > The VMs with different private IPs will run different services(e.g. web, > email, dns service). > > I hope OVN will support that feature. The patches I submitted may be not > good enough. If you have any idea, > let me know. > We do support it right now via LB right? i.e. one VIP:port = PrivateIP:Port. With just one target, it acts the same as a DNAT. > > > Thanks. > Nick > > On Nov 12, 2016, at 6:07 AM, Guru Shetty <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry for the delay in the reviews. > I understand that we can extend the current DNAT feature to include > DNAT:port. But is there is a use case where you want to use this? Any > extensions of the NAT table can be better designed if we understand the end > use-case for it. If not, I will just take a look at the first version of > the series. > > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
