Hi,

My thoughts are with Shashank on this, it makes sense to have 1 configure and 1 
make command to build a particular target, instead of having flexibility to 
specify multiple targets.

Thanks,
Anand Kumar 

On 2/8/18, 10:56 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Shashank 
Ram" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

    
    
    
    
    ________________________________________
    From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
    Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 10:43 AM
    To: Shashank Ram; [email protected]; [email protected]
    Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] datapath-windows: Support to selectively 
compile targets
    
    Trimming the message a bit.
    
    -----Mesaj original-----
    De la: [email protected]
    [mailto:[email protected]] În numele Shashank Ram
    Trimis: Thursday, February 8, 2018 7:50 PM
    Către: [email protected]; [email protected]
    Subiect: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] datapath-windows: Support to selectively
    compile targets
    
    Hi Alin, thanks for the review.
    I personally feel we should be consistent and run configure, and have a
    single make command to build both user space and kernel. What part did you
    find complicated?
    [Alin Serdean] I.e. if I configure to target 8. And after I need to target
    10 I need to do a reconfigure (similar, for debug and or other platforms).
    [SR]: In an automated environment, this shouldn't happen.
    For local compilation, you should be able to manually compile the kernel.
    
    The configure part is particularly slow on Windows.
    For convenience the old part with selecting Debug/Release and
    trying to build for all the compilers found in the system is still there, so
    building both
    userspace and kernel will still be in a single command.
    I don't see a huge issue to specify two or more make commands to build a
    particular target of the kernel
    via the shell.
    [SR]: I don't think its a big deal either, but its more convenient to run 1 
configure and 1
    make command.
    
    I prefer to keep this as is for now and wait for more reviews.
    
    _______________________________________________
    dev mailing list
    [email protected]
    
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_mailman_listinfo_ovs-2Ddev&d=DwIFBA&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=Q5z9tBe-nAOpE7LIHSPV8uy5-437agMXvkeHHMkR8Us&m=fKK6KZRD0tZEfwHzLhMsabCH5aXzzYiRP-pJR20Xj9o&s=nEl_7Q-LhJ74AdsiY85DjA-kWy0uESr5DyFrWDQYKjs&e=
    

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to