On 28 Feb 2023, at 17:23, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 04:24:57PM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote: >> >> >> On 16 Feb 2023, at 13:21, Eelco Chaudron wrote: >> >>> On 15 Feb 2023, at 21:15, Ilya Maximets wrote: >>> >>>> On 2/14/23 14:54, Eelco Chaudron wrote: >>>>> Run "make check-offloads" as part of the GitHub actions tests. >>>>> >>>>> This test was run 25 times using GitHub actions, and the >>>>> failing rerun test cases where excluded. There are quite some >>>>> first-run failures, but unfortunately, there is no other >>>>> more stable kernel available as a GitHub-hosted runner. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <[email protected]> >>>>> --- >>>> >>>> It doesn't seems to take that much time. Maybe it's not that >>>> bad of an idea after all. :) >>>> >>>> It might make sense to run this job with asan/ubsan enabled. >>>> What do you think? We might re-structure asan/ubsan jobs to >>>> run them at the same time for this, like OVN does. >>> >>> I think this was giving a lot of errors, but they might all be fixed by >>> Mike’s fixes. >>> >>> I’ll take a look and see what OVN does… >> >> I did make the change to combine the UBSAN and ASAN tests, but I did not >> enable it for this specific test. >> >> The tests takes too long (more than 30 min, so it’s canceled by GitHub), and >> there are some failures. Quickly looking at some it seems timing-related. > > FWIIW, OVN seems to take the approach of splitting system tests into three > batches: 1-99, 100-199, 200-. Or something like that. Thanks for bringing this up. I’ll put a note in my to-do list and will try to work on this later, and see if I can fix/exclude some of the timing issues. //Eelco _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
