On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 11:21:02AM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > > > On 28 Feb 2023, at 17:23, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 04:24:57PM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 16 Feb 2023, at 13:21, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > >> > >>> On 15 Feb 2023, at 21:15, Ilya Maximets wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 2/14/23 14:54, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > >>>>> Run "make check-offloads" as part of the GitHub actions tests. > >>>>> > >>>>> This test was run 25 times using GitHub actions, and the > >>>>> failing rerun test cases where excluded. There are quite some > >>>>> first-run failures, but unfortunately, there is no other > >>>>> more stable kernel available as a GitHub-hosted runner. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <[email protected]> > >>>>> --- > >>>> > >>>> It doesn't seems to take that much time. Maybe it's not that > >>>> bad of an idea after all. :) > >>>> > >>>> It might make sense to run this job with asan/ubsan enabled. > >>>> What do you think? We might re-structure asan/ubsan jobs to > >>>> run them at the same time for this, like OVN does. > >>> > >>> I think this was giving a lot of errors, but they might all be fixed by > >>> Mike’s fixes. > >>> > >>> I’ll take a look and see what OVN does… > >> > >> I did make the change to combine the UBSAN and ASAN tests, but I did not > >> enable it for this specific test. > >> > >> The tests takes too long (more than 30 min, so it’s canceled by GitHub), > >> and there are some failures. Quickly looking at some it seems > >> timing-related. > > > > FWIIW, OVN seems to take the approach of splitting system tests into three > > batches: 1-99, 100-199, 200-. Or something like that. > > Thanks for bringing this up. I’ll put a note in my to-do list and will try to > work on this later, and see if I can fix/exclude some of the timing issues.
Thanks. More automated testing makes me happy. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
