On 6/22/23 13:56, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> This avoids manual intervention when upstream ovn-kubernetes changes
>> its dependency versions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Patryk Diak <[email protected]>
>> Co-authored-by: Patryk Diak <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
>> ---
> 
> LGTM overall.  It's also the only patch to have successfully built
> recently, so I assume it will be important to apply for other patches to
> succeed.
> 

Thanks for the review!  Yes, all other patches were failing ovn-kube CI
when building the container image, effectively keeping us in the dark
wrt effects on ovn-kubernetes.

>>  .ci/ovn-kubernetes/Dockerfile        | 16 +++++++-------
>>  .ci/ovn-kubernetes/prepare.sh        | 11 ++++++++++
>>  .github/workflows/ovn-kubernetes.yml | 31 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> 
> We got some warnings on this file due to line lengths.  Maybe we should
> exclude yml from the line length check.  WDYT?
> 

Sure, I can post a patch for that.  Should I prepare a patch for OVS
though?  We normally try to keep our checkpatch version in sync with the
OVS one.

>>  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Aaron Conole <[email protected]>
> 

I pushed this patch to main.  Hopefully the CI turns green soon.

Regards,
Dumitru

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to