Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> writes:

> On 6/22/23 13:56, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> writes:
>> 
>>> This avoids manual intervention when upstream ovn-kubernetes changes
>>> its dependency versions.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Patryk Diak <[email protected]>
>>> Co-authored-by: Patryk Diak <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>> 
>> LGTM overall.  It's also the only patch to have successfully built
>> recently, so I assume it will be important to apply for other patches to
>> succeed.
>> 
>
> Thanks for the review!  Yes, all other patches were failing ovn-kube CI
> when building the container image, effectively keeping us in the dark
> wrt effects on ovn-kubernetes.
>
>>>  .ci/ovn-kubernetes/Dockerfile        | 16 +++++++-------
>>>  .ci/ovn-kubernetes/prepare.sh        | 11 ++++++++++
>>>  .github/workflows/ovn-kubernetes.yml | 31 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 
>> We got some warnings on this file due to line lengths.  Maybe we should
>> exclude yml from the line length check.  WDYT?
>> 
>
> Sure, I can post a patch for that.  Should I prepare a patch for OVS
> though?  We normally try to keep our checkpatch version in sync with the
> OVS one.

Please do :)  Then they can just be sync'd after, I guess.

>>>  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>> 
>> Acked-by: Aaron Conole <[email protected]>
>> 
>
> I pushed this patch to main.  Hopefully the CI turns green soon.
>
> Regards,
> Dumitru

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to