On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 1:16 PM Kevin Traynor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 27/11/2024 15:31, David Marchand wrote:
> > Fixes for Intel drivers are included in DPDK v23.11.2.
> >
> > Link: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?id=e8c2cccfbdef
> > Link: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?id=1970a0ca45f1
> > Link: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?id=80c5c9789b73
>
> > Fixes: 0256ee64ed39 ("dpdk: Use DPDK 23.11.2 release.")
>
> Shouldn't we use the same fixed commit as the one referenced in the
> workarounds (6f93d8e62f13 and 29abd07e4fa6) i.e.
> Fixes: 084c8087292c ("userspace: Support VXLAN and GENEVE TSO.")
I would not mark removing the workaround as fixing the commit adding tunnel tso.
At the time, adding those workarounds was indeed fixing 084c8087292c
("userspace: Support VXLAN and GENEVE TSO.".
What I meant with this Fixes: tag was that the bump to v23.11.2 should
have come with removing the workarounds.
Or maybe I am not getting your point :-).
--
David Marchand
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
