On 12/12/2024 12:27, David Marchand wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 1:16 PM Kevin Traynor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 27/11/2024 15:31, David Marchand wrote: >>> Fixes for Intel drivers are included in DPDK v23.11.2. >>> >>> Link: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?id=e8c2cccfbdef >>> Link: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?id=1970a0ca45f1 >>> Link: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?id=80c5c9789b73 >> >>> Fixes: 0256ee64ed39 ("dpdk: Use DPDK 23.11.2 release.") >> >> Shouldn't we use the same fixed commit as the one referenced in the >> workarounds (6f93d8e62f13 and 29abd07e4fa6) i.e. >> Fixes: 084c8087292c ("userspace: Support VXLAN and GENEVE TSO.") > > I would not mark removing the workaround as fixing the commit adding tunnel > tso. > At the time, adding those workarounds was indeed fixing 084c8087292c > ("userspace: Support VXLAN and GENEVE TSO.". > > What I meant with this Fixes: tag was that the bump to v23.11.2 should > have come with removing the workarounds. >
ok, got it. I thought you meant 23.11.2 introduced the issue. But now I understand you mean it should have fixed at that point. Thanks. > Or maybe I am not getting your point :-). > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
