We used application-level echo request and replies instead, because they are reliable even if a TCP connection passes through a firewall or proxy that does not properly pass through TCP keepalives.
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:48:04PM +0000, Hexin Wang wrote: > Hi Ben, > > What is the reason that it is not getting to the main release? This seems the > right keep alive mechanism for neutron to talk to ovn database, if they are > not running on the same host/container and would have to use tcp as the > transport. > > Thanks. > > Hexin > > > > > On 3/2/17, 3:45 PM, "Ben Pfaff" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:43:01PM +0000, Hexin Wang wrote: > >> I have a question on the following patch that use TCP keep alive for ovsdb > >> connection. > >> > >> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2011-April/251891.html > >> > >> Did this patch go into ovs main release? > > > >No. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
