Fair comment. In that case, is there any plan in making "inactivity probe" interval configurable in ovn north and south dub connection?
Thanks, Hexin > On Mar 6, 2017, at 10:59 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > If the application is extremely slow, then the connection is effectively > dead, and we might as well drop it anyway. > >> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 06:53:51PM +0000, Hexin Wang wrote: >> Hi Ben, >> >> TCP keep alive gives a good alternative to use cases where there is no >> firewall or proxy concern. Transport level keep alive is good enough for >> ovsdb to determine if connection is alive or not, without worrying if >> application is slow (or extremely slow) in open flow echo reply. >> >> Can we working on pushing this into ovs release? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Hexin >> >> >> >>> On 3/2/17, 3:57 PM, "Ben Pfaff" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> We used application-level echo request and replies instead, because they >>> are reliable even if a TCP connection passes through a firewall or proxy >>> that does not properly pass through TCP keepalives. >>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:48:04PM +0000, Hexin Wang wrote: >>>> Hi Ben, >>>> >>>> What is the reason that it is not getting to the main release? This seems >>>> the right keep alive mechanism for neutron to talk to ovn database, if >>>> they are not running on the same host/container and would have to use tcp >>>> as the transport. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Hexin >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 3/2/17, 3:45 PM, "Ben Pfaff" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:43:01PM +0000, Hexin Wang wrote: >>>>>> I have a question on the following patch that use TCP keep alive for >>>>>> ovsdb connection. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2011-April/251891.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Did this patch go into ovs main release? >>>>> >>>>> No. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
