I don't know about the plugin, someone else will have to help with that.
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:59:06PM +0000, Hexin Wang wrote: > How about from neutron networking-ovn plugin connecting to both northbound > and southbound db? > > Thanks. > > Hexin > > > > On 3/6/17, 12:56 PM, "Ben Pfaff" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >It already is, see ovn-controller(8). Note that ovn-controller only > >connects to the southbound database. > > > >On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 07:16:51PM +0000, Hexin Wang wrote: > >> Fair comment. In that case, is there any plan in making "inactivity probe" > >> interval configurable in ovn north and south dub connection? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Hexin > >> > >> > On Mar 6, 2017, at 10:59 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > If the application is extremely slow, then the connection is effectively > >> > dead, and we might as well drop it anyway. > >> > > >> >> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 06:53:51PM +0000, Hexin Wang wrote: > >> >> Hi Ben, > >> >> > >> >> TCP keep alive gives a good alternative to use cases where there is no > >> >> firewall or proxy concern. Transport level keep alive is good enough > >> >> for ovsdb to determine if connection is alive or not, without worrying > >> >> if application is slow (or extremely slow) in open flow echo reply. > >> >> > >> >> Can we working on pushing this into ovs release? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks. > >> >> > >> >> Hexin > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> On 3/2/17, 3:57 PM, "Ben Pfaff" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> We used application-level echo request and replies instead, because > >> >>> they > >> >>> are reliable even if a TCP connection passes through a firewall or > >> >>> proxy > >> >>> that does not properly pass through TCP keepalives. > >> >>> > >> >>>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:48:04PM +0000, Hexin Wang wrote: > >> >>>> Hi Ben, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> What is the reason that it is not getting to the main release? This > >> >>>> seems the right keep alive mechanism for neutron to talk to ovn > >> >>>> database, if they are not running on the same host/container and > >> >>>> would have to use tcp as the transport. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thanks. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Hexin > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> On 3/2/17, 3:45 PM, "Ben Pfaff" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:43:01PM +0000, Hexin Wang wrote: > >> >>>>>> I have a question on the following patch that use TCP keep alive > >> >>>>>> for ovsdb connection. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2011-April/251891.html > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Did this patch go into ovs main release? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> No. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
