On Dec 30, 2007 12:05 PM, Paul Alfille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll test against known humidity. In theory, the device could give numbers > > 100%. Does it seem otherwise accurate?
I've only started keeping log of values today but we've had them um on a webpage for a few months and we've seen it hit almost 120%. The values have looked okay compared to weather stations nearby though. If this is just a matter of the humidity sensor spiking at 100% owfs itself should cap it at 100% to actually be a humidity. I don't know how you do in theses cases. Would it make sense for owfs to cap it or should I do it myself after reading? Thanks, Pedro. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
