Well, I have to say that the site looks outdated and is difficult to navigate. 
It does not make it easy to get information that appears useful or 
authoritative. When I was new to owfs, I could not find even the basic 
information I needed to explain how owfs and owserver interact. The best 
information is found through searching listserv entries indexed by Google. This 
is a statement in itself to the ineffectiveness of the site and additionally to 
the important of improving the form of it. 

Colin


> On Sep 9, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Jan Kandziora <j...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>> Am 08.09.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Johan Ström:
>> 
>> .. what else?
> First: I'd love to get rid of are these personal blogs who give stray
> information bites which are quickly outdated and totally out of control.
> This is the source of most misfortune for owfs users. I'm pretty sure
> only 1 of 10 shows up here at the mailing list and ask us. Nine of ten
> people will give up or just live with their brittle setup.
> 
> 
> I have to admit: I personally hate those people who endlessly copypaste
> that blurb about using a pullup of 4.7k to 5V on the Raspberry Pi GPIO4.
> 
> The simple reason people can tell this is because... the authoritative
> source of information... our site... had nothing about this. Or at
> least, it's covered by layers and layers of owfs internals which sound
> like nonsense to anybody but us developers.
> 
> 
> Same with using the FUSE binding. People endlessly copypaste blurbs
> about using the FUSE binding.
> 
> We really, really should say people: Hey, we have a FUSE binding, it's a
> nice technical demo. But it turned out using FUSE for pseudofilesystems
> is a bad idea because of race conditions so... don't do that. Forget
> that thing exists. Thank you.
> 
> 
> The SWIG bindings, our next construction site. People usually *don't*
> know there are at least three python bindings to owfs for example, with
> the best one OFF-SITE. Or what the difference between owlib, owcapi and
> ownet is.
> 
> 
> And our zoo of host adapter options has to be explained. Simply. When to
> use which host adapter.
> 
> 
> And we should make people interested in owfs look right and left, too.
> The w1 kernel driver can make them happy, too (for example for using the
> DS28E17). The owfs external mechanism on the other hand can be used to
> put GPIOs into OWFS, which makes owserver some sort of Network I/O
> expander. And the two can be combined, making arbitrary I²C sensors into
> network-enabled owfs nodes with very little userspace code.
> 
> 
>> 
>> Jan, your last lines talked about alternative to push/pull content. A 
>> github hosted page could actually be edited directly in the github UI, 
>> there is a Edit button which opens an editor directly. You'd of course 
>> have to fork it first, and you still need to do basic markup.
>> But if instructed how to do it, is that too advanced?
> Not too advanced.
> 
> My concern was: For end users, the biggest hurdle would be additional
> software. They usually don't care about the markup, we have to fix that.
> 
> We need to have a documentation project where end users can easily edit
> pages and we have bit of control about what is written there, so
> outdated and wrong information cannot live forever. That's why I want to
> encourage end users to document their owfs related stuff at a central
> site. So we can maintain it.
> 
> This should be seperated from "official" documentation but in a way the
> difference is only sublime. So people see "Hey, my owfs project is
> recognized by the owfs people. Great!"
> 
> 
> So, having two wikis, one along the official sources and one for end
> users would be great.
> 
> I think we can push wiki pages created from manpages etc. so this will
> make Colin and Stefano happy too, I think.
> 
> 
> Okay? Can we settle on this? Or continue discussion?
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>    Jan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Owfs-developers mailing list
> Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to