On 14/09/16 09:02, Jan Kandziora wrote:
> Am 14.09.2016 um 07:21 schrieb Johan Ström:
>> Colin, Jan, Colin, and everyone else: Besides the above, what do you
>> guys think of the GitHub wiki? Would it be an acceptable way to go
>> forward? It certainly has a few downsides (mainly lack of structuring,
>> image uploads), but it's very easy to get started, and no external
>> hosting required.
>>
> I think we should go for it. Having less automation on the github site
> isn't too bad.
>
>
>> I think I would vote to focus on a single wiki to start with, and
>> nothing on GH pages besides perhaps welcome-page, very basic info and
>> pointers to the wiki.. That way we can start to build up all the info on
>> the wiki, and when we have some nice wiki-pages, we could move it to GH
>> pages ("the homepage") if we think it makes sense.
>>
> Yes, that's the way to go.
>
> About the welcome page: Let's start with a page about Onewire in
> general, then give owfs as *one* of the solutions.
>
> A driver hierarchy would help most to structure that page. Not an image,
> just a table of colored, clickable blocks
>
> And are you all okay with a bit uncouth writing style? Because I think
> it helps loosening up the exact, technical text parts.
>
>
I've been watching this but not saying much because I'm not really a
developer, but as a user I'd love to see more easily accessible
documentation. OWFS is by no means the worst documented project out
there (probably the worst example I've come across is Openhab) but
anything that can be done would help. I'll even offer to help...All the best Nigel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
