That's right Craig. I think Leon said it well: Let people be people -- let them be vague and a little incorrect -- listen more for the gist of what they're saying than the exact terminology.
http://secretgeek.net/program_communicate_4reasons.asp On the flip side, I shouldn't have been so lazy as to shorten it. Sorry if that confused anyone. Paul On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Craig van Nieuwkerk <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I agree with what you have said - web forms was revolutionary, and MVC > >> learnt a lot because of the experiences the team had. I also think it > would > >> have worked the opposite way - had MVC been released first, it might > have > >> changed how/whether Web Forms was created. I also agree that Web Forms > has > >> many good qualities and makes a good choice in many situations. > > > > The MVC pattern is very old and most certainly was NOT informed in any > way > > by the design of ASP.NET web forms. > > Yes, but I am fairly confident when he was saying MVC he mean ASP.NET > MVC. It's just shorter to write! > -- Paul Stovell
