I guess they never thought of that. Either that or they decided not to support the scenario where the subject line is blank. A case of reward users for correct behavior?
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:30 AM, silky <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Michael Minutillo > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good point > > Interestingly, this kind of highlights a bug in the mailman interface > (which is how I read this list these days): > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/pipermail/ozdotnet/2010-July/date.html > can't click a link that doesn't exist :P (luckily, the posts are > numbered sequentially ...) > > > > -- > > Michael M. Minutillo > > Indiscriminate Information Sponge > > Blog: http://wolfbyte-net.blogspot.com > > -- > silky > > Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy > of being this signature. > -- Michael M. Minutillo Indiscriminate Information Sponge Blog: http://wolfbyte-net.blogspot.com
