Close enough

On 22 July 2010 11:41, silky <michaelsli...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Michael Minutillo
> <michael.minuti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I guess they never thought of that. Either that or they decided not to
> > support the scenario where the subject line is blank. A case of reward
> users
> > for correct behavior?
>
> Maybe it's a philosophical position. Without a subject(ive) view there
> can be no content, as the subject(ive) view creates the world ... It's
> friday right?
>
>
> > --
> > Michael M. Minutillo
> > Indiscriminate Information Sponge
> > Blog: http://wolfbyte-net.blogspot.com
>
> --
> silky
>
> Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy
> of being this signature.
>



-- 
Meski

"Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, you'll
get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills

Reply via email to