If they don't respond "the source is available, if you want it do <insert>
then feel free.  Oh, and you can merge the change back, and we might accept
it" :^)

On 23 July 2010 06:21, David Connors <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 22 July 2010 11:41, silky <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Michael Minutillo
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I guess they never thought of that. Either that or they decided not to
>> > support the scenario where the subject line is blank. A case of reward
>> users
>> > for correct behavior?
>>
>> Maybe it's a philosophical position. Without a subject(ive) view there
>> can be no content, as the subject(ive) view creates the world ... It's
>> friday right?
>>
>
> Obviously this requires further investigation.
>
> They use a non-breaking space for the name anchors in the page but a
> carriage return when the subject is blank. According to my extensive 30
> seconds of testing, a non-breaking space in an anchor yields a clickable
> underline. A carriage return does not. The deeply philosophical question is
> "if white space does not have a space in it is it still white space?"
>
> I think you should take this forward with the people who write mailman and
> request an urgent fix. I normally find that the best way to start a
> conversation with freetards is: "Unlike Linux, a standards compliant
> platform such as Windows <insert whatever you want them to do here>." They
> respond really well.
>
> --
> *David Connors* | [email protected] | www.codify.com
> Software Engineer
> Codify Pty Ltd
> Phone: +61 (7) 3210 6268 | Facsimile: +61 (7) 3210 6269 | Mobile: +61 417
> 189 363
> V-Card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors
> Address Info: https://www.codify.com/contact
>
>


-- 
Meski

"Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, you'll
get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills

Reply via email to