So on a dual 6 core system that is 12 or 2? I miss seeing what gets counted. Then there's that option for running 2 virtual cpus per real cpu. Argh!
Mike On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Ken Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote: > Note that licensing changes for Standard and Enterprise editions to > per-core rather than per-CPU.**** > > ** ** > > I haven’t yet seen a comparison of our old per-CPU prices for SQL Server > 2008/R2 vs the new per-core prices for 2012. If the new per-core prices are > around 1/4 to 1/6 of the price of the old per-CPU, then I’ll be OK. But I’m > not holding my breath.**** > > ** ** > > Cheers**** > > Ken**** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Greg Keogh > *Sent:* Thursday, 21 June 2012 6:37 PM > *To:* 'ozDotNet' > *Subject:* [OT] SQL Server 2012**** > > ** ** > > I received a box from Singapore today with a single MSDN disc inside, the > June 2012 disc with SQL Server 2012. I’m creating a test virtual Win2008R2 > machine to install it on and see what’s different or exciting. I plan to > import some existing databases and sanity check that my apps work okay with > it. Has anyone got any feelings for SQL 2012 so far? Does it have anything > that might thrill the regular programmer? (as opposed to thrilling someone > building intergalactic networks with the more obscure features) -- Greg** > ** > -- Meski http://courteous.ly/aAOZcv "Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, you'll get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills
