|
Hi there,
Just received the new guidelines for administration of anti-D
to pregnant and post-partum women today in the mail. To be honest, found
it a bit difficult to understand, but maybe I need a bit of extra sleep under my
belt before I tackle it again! My question to the list is this, it appears
that due to a shortage of anti-D, the guidelines for administration were
changed, and for a period of approx. 2 years, women didn't routinely receive it
during their pregnancy. Now that supplies seem to be more abundant, the
guidelines have been changed back, to include administration of one dose of
immunoglobulin 624 IU at between 28 and 34 weeks of pregnancy. So what
have the outcomes for the women with negative blood groups during the past 2
years, when this hasn't been routine, and is there adequate research to suggest
that every woman should be having this dose? It is a blood product after
all, and a rare and expensive one at that. I know we all want to err on
the side of caution, but it seems strange that it was stopped due to a shortage,
and now that it's available, we should all be giving it again, with no
explanation of what indeed the impact of not administering it during this
antenatal period was.
Hope this makes sense,
Tania
|
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Anti-D - new guidelines Tom, Tania and Sam Smallwood
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Anti-D - new guideline... Lieve Huybrechts
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Anti-D - new guide... Denise Hynd
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Anti-D - new g... Tom, Tania and Sam Smallwood
- [ozmidwifery] Calling all Melbourne ... Tom, Tania and Sam Smallwood
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Anti-D - new guideline... jireland
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Anti-D - new guide... Leigh Evans
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Anti-D - new guideline... Denise Hynd
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Anti-D - new guideline... Carole Gilmour
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Anti-D - new guideline... Debby M
