|
I
would have to look for the research (we all know how 'fair' research can be!)
but the stated contra-indicators for vbac is previous rupture. Now it
doesn't actually state if the chances of another rupture are higher than a
normal scar or whether it is a case of "dam! Not going to let
that happen again!" attitude. You could argue I suppose that even a
dehiscence that required repair would be considered the same as a repeat
cs....?? Perhaps no vbac after one rupture/dehiscence would be based on
fear and/or presumption. Similar to the situation where a woman loses a
baby during labour there is the assumption that she will want a cs next
time.???
jo
-- |
Title: Message
- RE: [ozmidwifery] VBAC after dehsicence or UR? Dean & Jo
- Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC after dehsicence or... Janet Fraser
- [ozmidwifery] VBAC afterdehsicence or ... Dean & Jo
- Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC afterdehsic... brendamanning
- Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC afterde... Mike & Lindsay Kennedy
- RE: [ozmidwifery] VBAC af... Dean & Jo
- Re: [ozmidwifery] VBAC af... brendamanning
- RE: [ozmidwifery] VBA... Dean & Jo
- Re: [ozmidwifery] VBA... Mike & Lindsay Kennedy
