It is sometimes called the Hobbs line
Sonja
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gail McKenzie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au>
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 9:52 AM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] The Purple Line


This is really interesting. As a student I have access to hundreds of databases. I went straight to Lancet to access the article. (Actually, it is 1990, 335(8681), not 1997. Anyway, guess what? While the article is listed in the contents page at the front, it cannot be accessed. I tried all the databases & none of them will let me have it. Hmmmmmmm.....Mayhaps one will have to dig out an actual copy of the magazine to find it. Tell me again...Who controls access to information? Should I expect a knock on the door anytime soon?


From: "Tania Smallwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
To: <ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au>
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] The Purple Line
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 08:25:08 +0930

Hi Mary,



The reference from the article by Lesley Hobbs is the article that was
initially published in the Lancet.here is the complete reference from the
Hobbs article.



Byrne DL, Edmonds DK. Clinical method for evaluating progress in the first
stage of labour.  Lancet  1997; 335(8681): 122



I haven't actually seen the original study, just came across the Hobbs
article when I was doing my Mid training in 1998. She was published in the
Practising Midwife, in November 1998 Volume 1 Number 11 p 34-35.



I have often thought how great it would be to have some more compelling
evidence, in this age of having to justify everything with the research, but
the idea of conducting a study, and comparing length of purple line to
cervical dilatation on women throughout labour seems just unthinkable. So I think it will have to be one of those things that we see, and perhaps report on in a retrospective manner. Perhaps a national purple line database.just
thoughts!  I think Heather Hancock from Uni SA was considering doing some
research using photos and then looking at the time of the photo showing the elongated purple line, with the time of birth, and using that comparison to
propose that it could be used as a complementary tool when assessing a
woman's progress in labour.  Haven't heard anything else about it though.



Tania

xx



   _____

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Monday, 4 September 2006 7:57 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] The Purple Line



Tania, could I please have a few more details? E.g. author and complete
title of article? I am also puzzled by the (8681). I can't seem to access it
with the details you provided.  Thanks, MM



Tania wrote:

For anyone who's interested, the original piece of research was pubished in

the Lancet 1997, 335(8681): 122 entitled Clinical Method for Evaluat




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/436 - Release Date: 1/09/2006



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/436 - Release Date: 1/09/2006



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to