(Emailing people directly because I'm not allowed to post to the list
and the list server is down anyway)

It seems I should pay more attention to the p2p-hackers list! Dealing
with a whole hosts of posts in one:

* I never claimed that the IETF rejected anything, my slightly fuzzy
wording was that they "wouldn't go for it". This is, indeed, the TCPM
working group rather than the IETF as a whole which I omittied for
clarity. There wasn't a vote but it was pretty clear that several
people were against one specific point.

* I don't believe there are any current objections about the actually
cryptography. Eric Rescorla had some comments, but then I pointed out
that his suggested scheme was isomorphic to what I was proposing
anyway. Also, TCPM wasn't commenting on the higher level aspects.

* I don't wish any animosity towards TCPM. Several people there had a
differing opinion. It's not an unreasonable opinion given that I can't
release any information on latency effects. I might write a paper on
it, which will then be rejected by my employer's publication queue for
confidentiality reasons. At least I will have tried. I intend to
happily continue working with the TCPM WG on other things, such as
TCP-AO.

* The point of Obfuscated TCP was, indeed, to encrypt HTTP (and
anything else) in a low cost manner. So low that it could be enabled
by default, with no administration required.

* The specific point that several members of TCPM were unconvinced of
was a the additional of a bit from the application layer, carried in
the SYN frame. This is a violation of the usual layering and they
didn't believe I had provided sufficient justification. Almost by
definition I disagree, but it was an informed position.

* I'm not giving up, although things get very much less clean. My
plans are too inchoate to bring up here however. Anyone is welcome to
email me to discuss it.


Cheers All,


AGL

-- 
Adam Langley [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.imperialviolet.org
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

Reply via email to