Backhaul may have been low, but how did you do congestion control? . . .

T

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>
>
> travis kalanick wrote:
> > If uTorrent's UDP implementation results in a more aggressive TCP, there
> > is certainly the possibility that uTorrent could create massive FAIL on
> > the Internets.
> >
> > Anyone who's created/tuned a distributed-UDP-based-TCP-like protocol
> > (e.g. David Barrett, Matthew Kaufman, Alex Pankrotov) knows the delicate
> > nature of how distributed-TCP-in-UDP works, and how it can go very
> > haywire with just a couple of well-intentioned tweaks.
>
> Hi,
>
> Back about 1998 a company I was working for used a UDP wrapper
> around TCP packets. Each UDP packet had a unique number in the
> header for a given message/file transfer and the TCP inside did
> as well. The client collected them, found which ones had been
> lost in transit and sent a "resend message" for just those
> packets. Worked very well in very high RTT latency connections,
> like satellite and cell phone. The latency we measured on, if I
> recall correctly, Dokomo got as high as 51 SECONDS! although it
> averaged about 3 to 4 seconds and satellites was about 2 seconds
> RTT. TCP would never work, but UDP did. All that was needed was
> for the client to order the packets correctly and ask for any
> missing ones. The back haul went from about 13% for TCP on low
> latency links to under 1% using UDP. Even on high latency links
> we never saw much over 1% back haul traffic.
>
> One of the fun things about it was that the whole message/file
> could only be collected at end points due to the various routes
> UDP took at that time.
>
> The company still exists. It's now called Venturi Wireless at
> http://www.venturiwireless.com/
>
> Best,
>
> Allen
>
> There are only 11 types of people in the world; those who
> understand binary; those who don't; and those who could care
> less, they just want the g^&d$%^ computer to work!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2p-hackers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
>
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

Reply via email to