I disagree, it's stupid to put any p2p protocol on the internet without critique, especially one that is so massively deployed. It's backwards to test the client, release an alpha, then apply for an ietf draft. The question is what are they hiding? Anyway "get it working" ! = "release an alpha".
On Dec 1, 2008, at 3:29 PM, Wes Felter wrote: > jul wrote: >> Jan, >> Can you tell us why BitTorrent, Inc. is not opening this protocol? At >> this point UT is like Skype, a proprietary piece that I won't touch >> it >> with a 10 foot pole. > > One may imagine that BitTorrent's future submission to the IETF ledbat > WG will be quite similar to uTP. Or not, if you are conspiracy-minded. > We should remember that "get it working" comes before "release the > spec" > in the IETF standards process. > > Wes Felter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > p2p-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
