>[RRR] Yes, you are right. So, please help this P2PSIP WG to >complete the spec for the base P2PSIP protocol based on these >implementation experiences as soon as possible. We would >appreciate this.
We are constantly improving our software implementation and protocol specification. We published a paper at CCNC conference (Mobile P2PSIP - Peer-to-Peer SIP communication in mobile communities). It should be available from ieeexplore. Do you think that an implementation report (with some measurements) would be useful? Marcin >-----Original Message----- >From: ext Roy, Radhika R Dr CTR USA USAMC >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 21 January, 2008 16:13 >To: Matuszewski Marcin (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] >Subject: Re: RE: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory? > >Inline [RRR] > >----- Original Message ----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Friday, January 18, 2008 15:30 >Subject: RE: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory? >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [email protected] > >> >> >Opinion: This call to urgency can be best met IMHO by using P2PP >> >implemented on 600 nodes on Planet Lab since it meets the >criteria of >> >running code, open available free code and large footprint >> >deployment. >> >> I fully agree. Besides Nokia's implementation shows that >P2PP can also >> work on mobile devices. Some of you who visited Nokia's P2PSIP demo >> stand in Las Vegas could see a demo of the P2PP implementation on >> Nokiaphones. At the stand we were showing how a mobile phone that >> implementsP2PP can join the Columbia Univ.'s 600 nodes overlay on >> Planet Lab and allow users to use basic SIP services. The demo was >> done in colaborationwith Columbia Univ. >> Everyone who whould like to join the P2PP trial network >please send an >> email to Salman, Henning or me. >> >> Our goal is to specify a protocol based on our implementation >> experience. It is very easy to write protocol specifications >that are >> difficult to implement and therefore have high chances to >fail in the >> market, what we could see in the past. >> >> Marcin > >[RRR] Yes, you are right. So, please help this P2PSIP WG to >complete the spec for the base P2PSIP protocol based on these >implementation experiences as soon as possible. We would >appreciate this. > _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
