Marcin: Yes, that is what this WG, I believe, wants - helping to finalize the base P2PSIP protocol through implementation experiences as soon as possible.
Best regards, Radhika ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 7:30 Subject: RE: RE: RE: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi Radhika, > > We share the same goal. > > Salman, Henning and me are specifying the P2PP protocol > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/p2psip/draft-baset-p2psip-p2pp-01.txt. The > version of the document is going to be updated based on our recent > implementation experience. > > We would appreciate your suggestions and comments. The cooperation on > software development is also appreciated. This will allow P2PSIP > WG to > converge much faster. > > Marcin > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: ext Roy, Radhika R Dr CTR USA USAMC > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: 22 January, 2008 16:16 > >To: Matuszewski Marcin (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) > >Cc: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matuszewski > >Marcin (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) > >Subject: Re: RE: RE: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory? > > > >Hi, Mercin: > > > >What we want is to develop the P2PSIP protocol standard for > >this WG. The P2PSIP protocol drafts are there. You can help to > >provide insights which proposals are good and if needed what > >improvements need to be done to finalize the specs or you can > >proposed a new one or a modified draft combining with the > >existing ones. > > > >In this way, you can play a role to standardize the P2PSIP > >protocol for this WG. Then we can proceed to build other P2P > >things (e.g. HIP-overlay using the standardized P2PSIP > >protocol of this WG). > > > >Best regards, > >Radhika > > _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
