>-----Original Message----- >From: Bruce Lowekamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 10:14 PM
>- p2p relay: I'm not completely clear on this section. If it is a >proposal to have clients able to act as TURN servers, there is no >restriction in reload-03 that the turn servers are peers, clients, or >even members of the overlay. So I don't think there's any issue here. Per se, I think TURN Server is suitable for communication between nodes that have regular interaction, or is used for relaying media for nodes behind NAT. But it is not suitable for p2p signal routing, because the source peer/client does not know the IP and Port of the destination peer/client at the beginning. As a result the source peer/client can not send a "Send" indication with the destination's IP and Port to allow the traffic(signal) from the destination. In that case, a "P2P Relay" instead of a TURN server is preferred in the P2P signaling protocol. _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
