At Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:04:54 -0500, jiangxingfeng 36340 wrote: > > > > > One option is to let the routing decision at the peer protocol > > > level to override the one at the DHT level. Because peer could > > use > > > the rich information collected by the P2PSIP peer protocol and > > > could do the more optimal decision. This is one way in my mind > > how > > > the generic information is to be used. > > > > I think there are some opportunities for this type of split > > between > > the generic peer protocol and the DHT (one example being the use > > of > > random replicas/random replication factor which can be an > > application > > decision vs the successor replicas that a chord-based DHT > > maintains > > based on its routing setup). However, since only the DHT knows > > the > > overlay's topology and routing algorithms, I don't see how any > > other > > layer can make such a decision. Even the use of alternate paths > > to > > avoid routing attacks by compromised peers needs to rely on the > > DHT > > layer to identify an alternate starting peer that will still reach > > > > the destination ID. > > To me, I am not clear what the relationship between Peer protocol level and > DHT level from the RELOAD-3 architecture figure. Could you give me more > information on this? thank you.
Hmm.. Not sure what to say here. Maybe if you told me what you're not clear on I could try to explain more. -Ekr _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
