> > One option is to let the routing decision at the peer protocol > > level to override the one at the DHT level. Because peer could > use > > the rich information collected by the P2PSIP peer protocol and > > could do the more optimal decision. This is one way in my mind > how > > the generic information is to be used. > > I think there are some opportunities for this type of split > between > the generic peer protocol and the DHT (one example being the use > of > random replicas/random replication factor which can be an > application > decision vs the successor replicas that a chord-based DHT > maintains > based on its routing setup). However, since only the DHT knows > the > overlay's topology and routing algorithms, I don't see how any > other > layer can make such a decision. Even the use of alternate paths > to > avoid routing attacks by compromised peers needs to rely on the > DHT > layer to identify an alternate starting peer that will still reach > > the destination ID.
To me, I am not clear what the relationship between Peer protocol level and DHT level from the RELOAD-3 architecture figure. Could you give me more information on this? thank you. Regards! JiangXingFeng _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
