>-----Original Message----- >From: Henning Schulzrinne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:15 PM >To: Song Haibin >Cc: P2PSIP Mailing List >Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Terminology - no WG names > >> [Song] +1 Agree, although I don't think "resource discovery overlay" >> is an >> appropriate term for p2p overlay. >> > >Why not? If not, please suggest a better alternative. > [Song] I think most p2p overlays, no matter structured or unstructured, are used for resource discovery, e.g. file sharing, p2p VoIP and etc. I feel that if we use the term "resource discovery overlay" for now used "P2PSIP Overlay", we do not distinguish the application "SIP" from other applications. I don't know if we need the term "P2PSIP Overlay", or we just need a "P2P Overlay". For P2PSIP, we may just call it "SIP Over P2P". >> >> [Song] I think the concept and terminology draft is a centralized >> glossary >> for the WG. If there are divergent opinions on the terminology, we >> should >> discuss them in the mailing list or at the WG meeting, and the authors >> should update the terminology draft according to the consensus. >> > >That's the point of my email :-)
_______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
