> That's a feature, not a bug :-) The core P2P protocol being designed does not depend on SIP, even though it naturally supports that application.
> [Song] I think most p2p overlays, no matter structured or > unstructured, are > used for resource discovery, e.g. file sharing, p2p VoIP and etc. I > feel > that if we use the term "resource discovery overlay" for now used > "P2PSIP > Overlay", we do not distinguish the application "SIP" from other > applications. I don't know if we need the term "P2PSIP Overlay", or > we just > need a "P2P Overlay". For P2PSIP, we may just call it "SIP Over P2P". >>> _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
